Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mike Coslo" wrote
And there it is. WHY? Mike, I know it scares the bejeebers out of the professional-entry-level licensees out there who have essentially zero interest in whatever electrical thing happens when they mash the PPT switch, but by their license grant they are responsible for a ensuring that their transmitted signal meets a set of technical parameters beyond what the little blinky digits on the faceplate read. The current qualification process is woefully inadequate to ensure they can fulfill that responsibility. The current rules have kept most of these QCAO members in parts of the spectrum which have mostly local propagation, even with 1.5KW output. However, we can soon expect rules changes which may extend their turf to parts of the spectrum where their ignorance can have worldwide visibility and consequences. And that scares the bejeebers out of me. 73, de Hans, K0HB -- Pee equals eye-squared are. It's not just a good idea, it's the law! |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The 14 Petitions | Policy | |||
Responses to 14 Petitions on Code Testing | Policy | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | Policy | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | General | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | Dx |