Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"KØHB" wrote:
I have no agenda. Sure you do, Hans. Aren't you promoting an alternative licensing system with stiffer tests for newcomers? This points to an obvious reason why you would focus on the "electronics expert" portion of 97.1(d) while ignoring the rest. (snip) it lacks any foundation of credibility when you consider that the successful applicant for *any* amateur license is authorized to build his own station. (snip) The key word is authorized, not expected, required, obligated, compelled, obliged, or whatever. A person can build radio equipment if he or she wants, but there is no mandate to do so. Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The 14 Petitions | Policy | |||
Responses to 14 Petitions on Code Testing | Policy | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | Policy | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | General | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | Dx |