| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
"KØHB" wrote:
"Dwight Stewart" wrote What you've offered so far has certainly not provided that proof. (snip) So you cling to your "unfairness" and "unenforceable" jeremiads, even though they have both been refuted and discredited here with elementary logic. The beauty of the situation is that I don't have to prove anything to you anyhow. I just have to persuade the FCC. (snip) Considering your nonsense about QCAO, negative comments about Technicians, the lack of any valid reason for your proposal, the lack of any evidence supporting your claims, and so forth, I think your real intent was proven very nicely. If you've offered the same to the FCC, I suspect they will just as easily see through your proposal. Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| The 14 Petitions | Policy | |||
| Responses to 14 Petitions on Code Testing | Policy | |||
| Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | Policy | |||
| Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | General | |||
| Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | Dx | |||