KØHB wrote:
"Mike Coslo" wrote



And it makes an unenforceable power level for no real purpose.


Two points:

POINT A
------------

This "unenforceable" mantra is a weak argument, which does not gain strength
by the repetition.

Of course it's enforceable, or at least just as enforceable as power levels
have ever been. "Unenforceable" is a complete cop out. If power level is
not enforceable at 50W, then it's not enforceable at 2.5W, 25W, 50W ERP,
100W, 200W, or 1.5KW, all of which are power currently exist in FCC Amateur
Radio regulations.

It's not a cop out, it's a statement of truth.

POINT B
------------

That particular power level has a real purpose. The purpose is two-fold.

Purpose #1) It allows us to institute a "learners permit" class of license
in which we can limit power to a level which FCC has stated is safe for both
the user and unknowing passers-by.

A ten year license is hardly a learners permit.


Purpose #2) It allows us to institute a "learners permit" class of license
in which the power level minimizes the unwanted side-effects of granting
broad spectrum access to relatively underqualified operators.

The operators should be qualified.


Now, before
you spin up your rotors about "but QRP operators work around the world",
bear in mind that most of the "bad" signals heard on HF are the result of
ignorant operators trying to run a lot of power, and the consequent
splatter, flat-topping, birdies, over-compression, etc.

And some of them are Generals and Extras. So a proposal to allow new
people on HF with less qualifications is probably not going to improve
the situation.


On the other hand,
I've never heard a distorted or crappy QRP station.

Ya want to operate qrp succesfully, you need to do things right. These
QRP'ers are not operating QRP because they are beginners. I suspect most
if not all of them are high quality, experienced ops.



In further support of
the idea is the fact that all these 100W-class rigs you keep harping on are
running at near their designed-in upper capability, making them more likely
to become purveyors of all the crappy-signal symptoms I just talked about.
At 50W they are much less likely to be straining their design specifications
and consequently radiating cleaner signals.

And that is quite irrelevent to the situation. If it was relevant
limiting them to 25 watts would be even better.

- mike KB3EIA -