| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
"KØHB" wrote:
And of course I haven't belittled any amateurs. Of course you have. Your very proposal, recommending the Extra exam as the sole license exam for full privileges, suggests everyone except Extras are not educated enough and are therefore not qualified to be Amateur Radio operators. It also suggests the material covered on the first three written tests (Novice, Tech, and General), most of it not repeated in the Extra test, is not necessary - only the material in the Extra test is needed to be an Amateur Radio operator. Your proposal is the most elitest piece of garbage I've ever seen promoted in this radio service. I've only pointed out the inadequacies of the current qualification process and suggested an alternative. Don't be silly, Hans. You haven't pointed out any inadequacies at all. Indeed, that is where the main objection to your proposal exists. That you have decided to start bringing personality into the argument speaks volumes about the inadequacy of your arguments and logic skills. Your personality, your views, your bias, is at the very heart of your proposal, and therefore any discussion about this proposal. Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| The 14 Petitions | Policy | |||
| Responses to 14 Petitions on Code Testing | Policy | |||
| Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | Policy | |||
| Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | General | |||
| Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | Dx | |||