Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old December 6th 03, 12:34 AM
Dee D. Flint
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Dwight Stewart" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Dee D. Flint" wrote:

So please cite the statistical data that shows
people have had enough exposure to Morse
code to be able to evaluate it even though
they don't know it.



I'll tell you what, Dee. You show me where such statistical data is
collected and I'll cite it for you. Until then, it is clear that my

comments
were nothing more than opinions. Of course, you knew that before

responding.


Dwight Stewart (W5NET)


You made a statement that most people had such exposure and while I
naturally knew that was only your opinion, you stated it as if it were a
fact. Therefore I was justified in asking you to provide the data to
support that statement.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE

  #2   Report Post  
Old December 6th 03, 07:03 AM
Dwight Stewart
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Dee D. Flint" wrote:

You made a statement that most people
had such exposure and while I naturally
knew that was only your opinion, you
stated it as if it were a fact. Therefore I
was justified in asking you to provide the
data to support that statement.



That doesn't change my response. Again, show me where such statistical
data is collected and I'll cite it for you. Of course, you know it isn't
collected, and therefore my comment could not have been based on that, so
your question was clearly disingenuous.


Dwight Stewart (W5NET)

http://www.qsl.net/w5net/

  #3   Report Post  
Old December 6th 03, 07:49 AM
Dee D. Flint
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Dwight Stewart" wrote in message
news
"Dee D. Flint" wrote:

You made a statement that most people
had such exposure and while I naturally
knew that was only your opinion, you
stated it as if it were a fact. Therefore I
was justified in asking you to provide the
data to support that statement.



That doesn't change my response. Again, show me where such statistical
data is collected and I'll cite it for you. Of course, you know it isn't
collected, and therefore my comment could not have been based on that, so
your question was clearly disingenuous.


Dwight Stewart (W5NET)

http://www.qsl.net/w5net/


No I was illustrating that your statement was clearly disingenuous. Hiding
an opinion by making a statement that was couched in terms to make it appear
as if it were a fact. Therefore as a debater it is not only my right but my
duty to challenge it and ask you for proof. And you can't provide it.
Instead, you attempt to ask me to prove your statement, which is an invalid
debating technique.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The 14 Petitions Len Over 21 Policy 3 November 10th 03 01:31 AM
Responses to 14 Petitions on Code Testing Len Over 21 Policy 0 October 23rd 03 12:38 AM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 Radionews Policy 0 September 20th 03 05:13 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 Radionews General 0 September 20th 03 05:12 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 Radionews Dx 0 September 20th 03 05:12 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:58 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017