| Home | 
| Search | 
| Today's Posts | 
| 
		 
			 
			#11  
			
			
			 
		
	   
			
			
		 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			"KØHB" wrote: 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	I expect it would be a longer test than todays Extra, but probably not 120 questions (since some things, like band segments for example, would be the same as for the learner-permit level), and perhaps not necessarily in one sitting -- could be structured to be taken in 2 (or 3?) sessions for those who are intimidated by lengthy exams or have weak bladders. In the end, I've described several, what I consider, serious faults in your proposal, and that's without even getting into what I think the FCC's perspective might be. I don't even think you're being realistic at this point. Because of that, I don't think your proposal has a chance in Hades of getting any further than a passing discussion in this newsgroup. As such, I'll pass on any further discussion about it until something more substantial is added to the discussion. Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/  | 
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread | 
| Display Modes | |
		
  | 
	
		 | 
			 
			Similar Threads
		 | 
	||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| The 14 Petitions | Policy | |||
| Responses to 14 Petitions on Code Testing | Policy | |||
| Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | Policy | |||
| Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | General | |||
| Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | Dx | |||