Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"KØHB" wrote:
I expect it would be a longer test than todays Extra, but probably not 120 questions (since some things, like band segments for example, would be the same as for the learner-permit level), and perhaps not necessarily in one sitting -- could be structured to be taken in 2 (or 3?) sessions for those who are intimidated by lengthy exams or have weak bladders. In the end, I've described several, what I consider, serious faults in your proposal, and that's without even getting into what I think the FCC's perspective might be. I don't even think you're being realistic at this point. Because of that, I don't think your proposal has a chance in Hades of getting any further than a passing discussion in this newsgroup. As such, I'll pass on any further discussion about it until something more substantial is added to the discussion. Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The 14 Petitions | Policy | |||
Responses to 14 Petitions on Code Testing | Policy | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | Policy | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | General | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | Dx |