|
Hello, Dwight.
Although way off topic (as are many threads here), I couldn't resist this one. They say where there is smoke, there is fire. The smoke is so thick around Michael Jackson that they will probably argue that the smoke is too thick so you can't see and therefore prove fire. I'll grant the one arguement that will come up - there will be folks out to make money. But it would appear that this may well not be the case this time. What really galls me is that some folks that have a *lot* of money (I'm talking hundreds of millions of dollars) or political connections appear to be able to buy their way out of nasty situations (Whitewater comes to mind here as well as OJ). Personally, I think the guy is right off his rocker, but the name of the game should be to protect society (especially kids). Since his close call in the early 90s hasn't seemed to have any effect on him, he is going to have to be put away somewhere where he can't cause more damage(assuming he is convicted). I still worry about what money can buy. If he isn't able to buy out the victim, he can sure afford to buy a ton of attourneys. How does one district attourney with a staff of attourneys that are already very busy deal with someone who can keep a stable full of attourneys coming in from every direction? I also believe that he married Lisa Marie Presley as a smoke screen. How many divorces so far? I believe, and please correct me if I am wrong, that he was never married until that mess 10 years ago or so. Suddenly, he gets married. And divorced. And ... so on and so on. Frankly, I don't care what someone does in bed - as long as they leave kids and non-consenting adults out of it; especially kids. I totally agree with your accessment as to classic symptoms of a pedophile. Neverland should be renamed Never - Ever land. Why just the kids and not the whole family? I believe he was paying his security guards $18.00 per hour over 10 years ago. For the wealthy, this may well be normal - but it also tends to keep those guards' mouths shut. Sorry for the long ramblings. I suspect, as do you, that this case is going to be another media circus court case. In all honesty, where are they going to find jurors? Oh - I forgot, the Michael Jackson fans. I'd be hard put to be impartial with all of the other known facts (none of which is that he actually molested a kid, but, as I mentioned, there is a ton of smoke and I guarantee there is a fire). If he isn't convicted, how old do these characters get before their libido finally slows down? Sorry for being so long winded, Dwight, but this case has me quite upset (and I think most folks should be upset). 73 from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA |
'cmon. Read the headers. You just fed a troll :)
73 from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA "WA8ULX" wrote in message ... I'm a no code tech and a Michael Jackson fan too. don't be mean to my hero. Are all you CBplussers like MJ? |
Dwight,
I almost agree with you except on that "clear and present danger". I wouldn't want my kid to go near that place; then again, you mention there is no law against stupidity. Sigh ... 73 from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA |
:))
Thanx for a chuckle, Mike! 73 from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA "Mike Coslo" wrote in message t... N8WWM wrote: i wish i could sleep over jackos house. Too old? - Mike KB3EIA - |
"Jim Hampton" wrote in message
... Hello, Dwight. Although way off topic (as are many threads here), I couldn't resist this one. They say where there is smoke, there is fire. The smoke is so thick around Michael Jackson that they will probably argue that the smoke is too thick so you can't see and therefore prove fire. I'll grant the one arguement that will come up - there will be folks out to make money. But it would appear that this may well not be the case this time. What really galls me is that some folks that have a *lot* of money (I'm talking hundreds of millions of dollars) or political connections appear to be able to buy their way out of nasty situations (Whitewater comes to mind here as well as OJ). Personally, I think the guy is right off his rocker, but the name of the game should be to protect society (especially kids). Since his close call in the early 90s hasn't seemed to have any effect on him, he is going to have to be put away somewhere where he can't cause more damage(assuming he is convicted). I still worry about what money can buy. If he isn't able to buy out the victim, he can sure afford to buy a ton of attourneys. How does one district attourney with a staff of attourneys that are already very busy deal with someone who can keep a stable full of attourneys coming in from every direction? I also believe that he married Lisa Marie Presley as a smoke screen. How many divorces so far? I believe, and please correct me if I am wrong, that he was never married until that mess 10 years ago or so. Suddenly, he gets married. And divorced. And ... so on and so on. Frankly, I don't care what someone does in bed - as long as they leave kids and non-consenting adults out of it; especially kids. I totally agree with your accessment as to classic symptoms of a pedophile. Neverland should be renamed Never - Ever land. Why just the kids and not the whole family? I believe he was paying his security guards $18.00 per hour over 10 years ago. For the wealthy, this may well be normal - but it also tends to keep those guards' mouths shut. Sorry for the long ramblings. I suspect, as do you, that this case is going to be another media circus court case. In all honesty, where are they going to find jurors? Oh - I forgot, the Michael Jackson fans. I'd be hard put to be impartial with all of the other known facts (none of which is that he actually molested a kid, but, as I mentioned, there is a ton of smoke and I guarantee there is a fire). If he isn't convicted, how old do these characters get before their libido finally slows down? Sorry for being so long winded, Dwight, but this case has me quite upset (and I think most folks should be upset). 73 from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA Well, personally, I think it's rather interesting that it is the Michael Jackson story that draws such a debate--when the Catholic priests, bishops, and whomever else in the Catholic Church, have been in the news for at least the last two years...and with increasing evidence, admitted guilt, admitted "sweeping it under the rug," and adults who were kids when they were raped by the priests!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! In the Michael Jackson case(s), there have been no convictions--only speculation and rumors thusfar. I am not pointing up innocence or guilt--only puzzled by the weirdness of frenzy for the Michael Jackson story; when we have a whole host of tragedies--*proven* not just supposed--from the Catholic Church... I just don't get you folks... Kim W5TIT |
"Kim W5TIT" wrote:
Oh good grief. This is ludicrous! Do you realize what a mockery you are making of the United States legal system? The US legal system has made a mockery of itself, without any help from Larry & Dwight. OJ walked, MJ will walk, Malvo will cop insanity, Scott Peterson will walk, and Zacarias Moussaoui is making a fool of our inept Attorney General Ashcroft. 73, Hans, K0HB |
In article .net, "Dwight
Stewart" writes: Were you watching Fox television yesterday? They had a woman on who is still planning to send her son to sleep over with Jackson, even after all that has happened over the last few days. Don't ask me why she would do it. I have absolutely no idea why anyone would do something that stupid. Dwight Stewart (W5NET) Dwight: I hope she was wearing a strait jacket, and being attended by two of those nice young men in the clean white coats while she was giving that interview. 73 de Larry, K3LT |
|
|
I've thought about that too. But, how would we hold them responsible - stupidity isn't a crime in this country? Letting a child sleep with an adult is certainly stupid, but we'd have to prove more than that to actually hold the parents responsible. And I can't think of anything specific in the laws we can apply to the parents in this case. Child endangerment is the only thing that comes close, but I don't even think that would fly. To convict, you'd have to show the parents should have known there was a clear and present danger. Since JUST sleeping with an adult is not illegal, that may be a tough case to prove. Anyway, since you said "something" in the first paragraph (not anything specific), perhaps you're having the same problem I'm having. Dwight Stewart (W5NET) Dwight: Any adult, other than a parent, sleeping with a child is just plain sick -- period, End Of Story. Even in the case of parents, it is definitely not a good idea and should be discouraged to the greatest extent possible, although there are occasional, and rare, times when it may be OK to comfort the child in unusual circumstances causing emotional stress. Any parent permitting their child to attend "Neverland" ranch, with it's accused child molester and world-famous weirdo in residence, is simply exercising nothing less than a criminal level of negligence. Criminal charges should be sought against the parents of the 12-year old boy in question, and he should be immediately removed from that home and placed in protective custody in a registered foster care facility. 73 de Larry, K3LT |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:18 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com