RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Policy (https://www.radiobanter.com/policy/)
-   -   Is Michael Jackson Innocent? (https://www.radiobanter.com/policy/27099-re-michael-jackson-innocent.html)

Kim W5TIT November 24th 03 10:19 AM

"Larry Roll K3LT" wrote in message
...
In article , "Kim W5TIT"


writes:


Y'know what, Larry? Phuck (HansTM) you and your patriarchal high horse

you
ride around on. I owe *you* nor anyone else, *but* possibly Dwight, an
apology. I can nearly guarantee you that Dwight would know that I was

not
commenting on the part about his brother. Now sit the phuck down and

shut
the phuck up.

Kim W5TIT


Kim:

I neither stand nor speak while I'm typing at my computer keyboard.
And you're still a childish, boorish, ignorant person. You screwed up
and you'll never admit it, because you are totally self-centered. Whether
Dwight took offense or not, others have -- and that is what you should
be apologizing for. However, you're too self-centered to ever be able
to figure that out. You're pitiful.

73 de Larry, K3LT



As stated, no one (*other* than possibly Dwight) was owed an apology. Have
you ever seen me demand an apology for being offended by you, Larry? And,
as has come to pass, Dwight was quite reasonable (something which you
neither understand nor are capable of) about how he understood the post.

And, as to your opinion of me--or anyone else, Larry--you are the last soul
on this Earth with whom I find any merit for anything done or not done by
others. Now, back to forgetting about responding to you since you drone on
with your impish, childish, boring, self-centered ignorance...

You and your *"Dr."* should have some tea...

Kim W5TIT



N8WWM November 24th 03 11:22 AM

In article . net, Dwight
Stewart says...


"Mike Coslo" wrote:
N8WWM wrote:

i wish i could sleep over jackos house.


Too old?



He acts childish enough at times, Mike. Since Michael Jackson thinks of
himself as a kid, perhaps N8WWM can also convince Michael Jackson that he's
a kid too. I'll certainly vouch for you, N8WWM. ;-)


Dwight Stewart (W5NET)

http://www.qsl.net/w5net/

Im not childish I just like michaels music. Why cant we just leave his personal
life out of this? He's innocent until proven guilty just like i am. The rain
report claimed I jammed repeaters but they didn't prove it.


WA8ULX November 24th 03 01:34 PM

I think you just insulted the fruit cake.


Big Deal, hes probably a CBplusser

Ryan, KC8PMX November 24th 03 02:39 PM

Isn't it funny that a original post that had NOTHING to do with AMATEUR
RADIO is getting more exposure than the old code/no code debate???


"Dwight Stewart" wrote in message
hlink.net...
"Jim Hampton" wrote:

Although way off topic (as are many threads
here), I couldn't resist this one.



Obviously, I couldn't resist the topic either (it appears the same is

true
for others). And, yes, it is certainly off-topic. However, I hope there is
room in this newgroup for less formal discussions also. After all, as ham
operators, we do like to talk, in some way or another, with others.

However,
for those who are not interested, I made sure the topic was very clear in
the subject line so they can easily skip the discussion.


(snip) I'll grant the one arguement that will
come up - there will be folks out to make
money. (snip)



Oh, you can bet your bottom dollar on that. Lawyer fees. Advertising for
the news organizations. Lawsuits. Book deals. Interviews. The lecture
circuit. Paparazzi. The tabloids. Money is going to be flying everywhere.


Personally, I think the guy is right off his rocker,
but the name of the game should be to protect
society (especially kids). (snip)



Yep. That's why I tried to avoid anything outside that in my original
message. If the guy wants to sleep in an oxygen tent (or not), more power

to
him (even if I do think it's a little strange).


(snip) I believe, and please correct me if I am
wrong, that he was never married until that mess
10 years ago or so. Suddenly, he gets married.
And divorced. And ... so on and so on.



I also found his sudden desire to get married somewhat questionable.


I totally agree with your accessment as to
classic symptoms of a pedophile. Neverland
should be renamed Never - Ever land. Why
just the kids and not the whole family? (snip)



I've always been interested in detective mysteries (in the Sherlock

Holmes
style), so have read a lot (both fiction and non-fiction) on the subject

of
criminals and law enforcement. Based on what I've read, Michael Jackson
seems to fit the classic picture of a pedophile.


Sorry for the long ramblings. I suspect, as do
you, that this case is going to be another media
circus court case. (snip)



What you wrote was well thought out, so was a joy to read. As for the
media circus, this case may reach an all time high (or low depending on

your
perspective).


If he isn't convicted, how old do these characters
get before their libido finally slows down? (snip)



Based on what I've read, quite old. Note that we're talking about a
diverse group here. Not all pedophiles seek actual sexual intercourse with
children. Some limit their activities to just looking at images of, or
photographing, young children. Others prefer to touch or fondle children

or
have children touch or fondle them, but may never go beyond that. And, of
course, some are seeking sexual intercourse. Whatever the case, the sex
drive tends to mirror the sex drive of a normal person. In general,

attempts
at actual sexual intercourse tends to slow down by the late thirties to
early fifties, but fondling and touching may continue for many years after
that. Some pedophiles have been arrested in their seventies or even
eighties.


Dwight Stewart (W5NET)

http://www.qsl.net/w5net/




JJ November 24th 03 08:55 PM

N8WWM wrote:

In article . net, Dwight
Stewart says...


"Mike Coslo" wrote:

N8WWM wrote:


i wish i could sleep over jackos house.

Too old?





Im not childish I just like michaels music.


Anyone would have to be very childish to like his noise he attempts to
pass off as music.


Dwight Stewart November 24th 03 10:44 PM

"Ryan, KC8PMX" wrote:

Isn't it funny that a original post that had
NOTHING to do with AMATEUR
RADIO is getting more exposure than
the old XXXX/no XXXX debate???



Please don't mention that word, Ryan. If we're careful, we may get the
record for the longest time without any significant discussion of that
subject. ;-)


Dwight Stewart (W5NET)

http://www.qsl.net/w5net/


Dwight Stewart November 24th 03 11:48 PM

"Kim W5TIT" wrote:

As stated, no one (*other* than possibly
Dwight) was owed an apology. Have
you ever seen me demand an apology for
being offended by you, Larry? And, as
has come to pass, Dwight was quite
reasonable (something which you neither
understand nor are capable of) about
how he understood the post. (snip)



Perhaps it might be a good idea to simply drop the matter while you're
still ahead, Kim. Your words were certainly questionable and could easily be
interpreted the way many others did. But I made a choice to interpret those
words differently to avoid additional confrontation. But that doesn't mean
that my chosen interpretation is really what you meant, or is now a defense
of what you said. Enough said.


Dwight Stewart (W5NET)

http://www.qsl.net/w5net/


Dwight Stewart November 25th 03 12:02 AM

"Dwight Stewart" wrote:

Is there anyone out there who actually believes
Michael Jackson is really innocent of this latest
charge? (snip)



Has anyone noticed the Jackson spin machine in action lately? In just the
last few days on the talk shows, I've seen or heard from Michael Jackson's
brother, father, sister, several fans, his ex-spiritual advisor (?), his
ex-magician (?), and so on. Did you also notice they all seem to be using
the exact same words ("he's a child himself," "its' normal for him to sleep
with kids," "it's all totally innocent," "they're out to get him because
he's famous," and so on). Too bad the victim's family doesn't have that type
of support on those talk shows.


Dwight Stewart (W5NET)

http://www.qsl.net/w5net/


Kim W5TIT November 25th 03 12:32 AM

"Ryan, KC8PMX" wrote in message
...
Isn't it funny that a original post that had NOTHING to do with AMATEUR
RADIO is getting more exposure than the old code/no code debate???


I think it goes to boredom with that topic...

Kim W5TIT



Mike Coslo November 25th 03 12:37 AM

Kim W5TIT wrote:

"Mike Coslo" wrote in message
et...

Alun wrote:

Well, you know, we go camping all in one tent. There are partitions, but
they are only made of canvas. It's private enough when the kids are
asleep, though. For that matter, even if you are in different tents you
can hear everything. I imagine that where everyone shares one room it's


a

matter of waiting until everyone is asleep and being very quiet.


Oy! I had to chuckle when I read that, Alun! Quiet? I mean I guess that
must happen, but I think I'll opt for privacy. 8^)

- Mike KB3EIA -



ROFLMAO! TMI, Mike, TMI!!!!


Hehe, yeah, probably. Ohh what a strange thread!

- Mike KB3EIA -



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:46 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com