"KØHB" wrote:

The US legal system has made a mockery
of itself, without any help from Larry &
Dwight. (snip)


Amen, Hans.


Dwight Stewart (W5NET)

http://www.qsl.net/w5net/

In article ,
(Len Over 21) writes:

He is obviously GUILTY because he has never taken an amateur
radio test or earned that epitome of radio respect: Morsemanship.

I will suggest that you contact the FCC and put forth a petition to
have Jackson permanently banned from having anything to do with
U.S. amateur radio.

dit dit

Lennie:

This thread is off-topic, by the admission of the poster who initiated it.
So far, everyone except Bruce, Kim, and yourself has recognized that
fact and has replied accordingly.

That's all I'm going to say; I'll allow everyone else to draw their own
conclusions.

73 de Larry, K3LT

So far, everyone except Bruce, Kim, and yourself has recognized that
fact and has replied accordingly.


Who cares Larry, the guy is a FRUIT CAKE.

WA8ULX wrote:

So far, everyone except Bruce, Kim, and yourself has recognized that
fact and has replied accordingly.



Who cares Larry, the guy is a FRUIT CAKE.

I think you just insulted the fruit cake.

I think you just insulted the fruit cake.


Big Deal, hes probably a CBplusser

Kim W5TIT wrote:


Oh, and by the way, Dwight. In the event that you would be (and I don't
think you would) as childish as Larry, *if* you took the above to think that
I was including the story of your brother in my "hilarious" comment, then
you would be wrong; however I apologize to you if I implied that.

Sure is what it looked like, but okay, I'll accept that you didn't mean
that.

What did you mean?

- Mike KB3EIA -

"Mike Coslo" wrote in message
et...
Kim W5TIT wrote:


Oh, and by the way, Dwight. In the event that you would be (and I don't
think you would) as childish as Larry, *if* you took the above to think
that
I was including the story of your brother in my "hilarious" comment,
then
you would be wrong; however I apologize to you if I implied that.

Sure is what it looked like, but okay, I'll accept that you didn't mean
that.

What did you mean?

- Mike KB3EIA -


Oh, fer cryin' out loud. Take out the last paragraph, the one about
Dwight's brother-in-law. The reaction to the Michael Jackson story, as
depicted by Dwight in *all but* his relay about his brother's death, is way
too much.

In contrast, there is the Catholic Church stories around the same issue.
While I haven't read this newsgroup very often over the past year or so,
*except* for about the last what--three/four months--I don't recall seeing
any "I'm Shocked" posts on those rapes and abuses.

Leave the story about Dwight's brother out of it. And, this is the last
I'll say about that part of it--it has nothing to do with what my comments
were about. I don't think there's anyone I've seen post in this newsgroup
that is *that* heartless. Nearly, but not quite.

Kim W5TIT

"Kim W5TIT" wrote:

(snip) In contrast, there is the Catholic Church
stories around the same issue. While I haven't
read this newsgroup very often over the past
year or so, *except* for about the last what--
three/four months--I don't recall seeing any
"I'm Shocked" posts on those rapes and
abuses. (snip)


Actually, if I remember correctly, there have been several discussions in
this newsgroup over the last couple of years about the sexual abuse of young
men within the Catholic Church. Of course, since this situation involves a
widely known person, it is natural for this situation to garnish far more
public attention.


Dwight Stewart (W5NET)

http://www.qsl.net/w5net/

In article , "Kim W5TIT"
writes:


From Michael Jackson's arrest to the above. Can it get any more
hilarious?

Kim W5TIT



Oh, and by the way, Dwight. In the event that you would be (and I don't
think you would) as childish as Larry, *if* you took the above to think that
I was including the story of your brother in my "hilarious" comment, then
you would be wrong; however I apologize to you if I implied that.

Kim W5TIT

Kim:

You said, (quoting above) "From Michael Jackson's arrest to the above.
Can it get any more hilarious?" Well, Kim, "the above" included the
shocking story of how Dwight's brother was brutally murdered. You'll
have to forgive me, but I cannot find anything "hilarious" about that!

I have already acknowledged that you may have let that word fly without
realizing that it included the story of Dwight's brother. I am not making
any attempt to grind any axe with you; I just want you to at least begin
to TRY to think things through a bit better before making reactionary
replies to well-considered postings by others.

One more thing -- it would have gone a long way toward helping you
establish some scintilla of credibility if you could have simply accepted
responsibility for your mistake without the accompanying backpedalling.
Perhaps, some day when you grow up intellectually and emotionally,
you may become aware of such things.

73 de Larry, K3LT

In article , "Kim W5TIT"
writes:

Kim W5TIT

Well, folks, here we are now faced with a dual tragedy -- the fact that
Dwight's brother was brutally murdered in a heinous crime of violence,
and the fact that Kim thinks it's "hilarious."

Dwight, you have my heartfelt sympathy and most sincere condolences.

Kim, I can only hope that, as usual, you simply weren't thinking before
you let your fingers spout off their usual gibberish. If you truly meant
what you said, you are beneath contempt.

73 de Larry, K3LT


Larry, you're an ass, as usual. For anyone but those who *choose* to be
miserable, such as yourself--it is quite understood that the loss of human
life is a tragedy.

Kim:

Correct -- which is why I never refer to it as "hilarious," such as you did.

And, for anyone with even half a brain, *not* such as
yourself--it is a given that I would not express such assinine thoughts as
that the death of someone--*anyone* I might add--is hilarious.

Except for the fact that you did, indeed, use that exact word directly in
reference to the death of Dwight's brother.

Go ahead, though, keep being miserable.

Why should I work your side of the street?

Whether you've noticed it by now or not, Kim, I have already acknowledged
the fact that you could have made a mistake in the use of the word "hilarious"
in it's given context. However, your reaction is, as usual, to go on the
defensive, not accept responsibility for your mistake, and attempt to backpedal
your way to a position of good standing. Did it ever occur to simply take
responsibility for your mistake, offer Dwight and the rest of the newsgroup
a simple, heartfelt apology, and take your fat little fingers off the keyboard
for a while? I didn't think so -- and the results were as predictable as ever.

73 de Larry, K3LT