Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike Coslo wrote in message ...
As for sentencing, that is a different thing. I think loonyland has a minimum 3 year sentence per incident, but envisioning him in a state prison is hard to do. Perhaps if it happens, they will try to get him sent to Juvy? That would be just like California...Send a pedophile to juvy. That would be like sending Richard Speck to Chino Women's Correctional Facility. Steve |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steve Robeson, K4CAP wrote:
Mike Coslo wrote in message ... As for sentencing, that is a different thing. I think loonyland has a minimum 3 year sentence per incident, but envisioning him in a state prison is hard to do. Perhaps if it happens, they will try to get him sent to Juvy? That would be just like California...Send a pedophile to juvy. Ayup! If he's convicted, the kid's parents should be nailed with something too. Anyone who allows a pubescent child that a 40 something guy wants to pick up, take to his amusement park home and hop into bed with the kid (all those things are widely known) should be held responsible. That would be like sending Richard Speck to Chino Women's Correctional Facility. That would be one way of cutting down on prison population! - Mike KB3EIA - |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mike Coslo" wrote:
If he's convicted, the kid's parents should be nailed with something too. Anyone who allows a pubescent child that a 40 something guy wants to pick up, take to his amusement park home and hop into bed with the kid (all those things are widely known) should be held responsible. (snip) I've thought about that too. But, how would we hold them responsible - stupidity isn't a crime in this country? Letting a child sleep with an adult is certainly stupid, but we'd have to prove more than that to actually hold the parents responsible. And I can't think of anything specific in the laws we can apply to the parents in this case. Child endangerment is the only thing that comes close, but I don't even think that would fly. To convict, you'd have to show the parents should have known there was a clear and present danger. Since JUST sleeping with an adult is not illegal, that may be a tough case to prove. Anyway, since you said "something" in the first paragraph (not anything specific), perhaps you're having the same problem I'm having. Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dwight,
I almost agree with you except on that "clear and present danger". I wouldn't want my kid to go near that place; then again, you mention there is no law against stupidity. Sigh ... 73 from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jim Hampton" wrote:
I almost agree with you except on that "clear and present danger". I wouldn't want my kid to go near that place; then again, you mention there is no law against stupidity. Sigh ... Note we're talking about the subject (young boy) of the current legal proceedings. Since there were no actual criminal charges in the first incident ten years ago, and nothing actually proven, it would be difficult to prove a clear and present danger existed for this boy. However, since criminal charges now exist and are widely known, it should be easier to prove a clear and present danger existed when it comes to parents who allow their kids to sleep with MJ in the future. Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() I've thought about that too. But, how would we hold them responsible - stupidity isn't a crime in this country? Letting a child sleep with an adult is certainly stupid, but we'd have to prove more than that to actually hold the parents responsible. And I can't think of anything specific in the laws we can apply to the parents in this case. Child endangerment is the only thing that comes close, but I don't even think that would fly. To convict, you'd have to show the parents should have known there was a clear and present danger. Since JUST sleeping with an adult is not illegal, that may be a tough case to prove. Anyway, since you said "something" in the first paragraph (not anything specific), perhaps you're having the same problem I'm having. Dwight Stewart (W5NET) Dwight: Any adult, other than a parent, sleeping with a child is just plain sick -- period, End Of Story. Even in the case of parents, it is definitely not a good idea and should be discouraged to the greatest extent possible, although there are occasional, and rare, times when it may be OK to comfort the child in unusual circumstances causing emotional stress. Any parent permitting their child to attend "Neverland" ranch, with it's accused child molester and world-famous weirdo in residence, is simply exercising nothing less than a criminal level of negligence. Criminal charges should be sought against the parents of the 12-year old boy in question, and he should be immediately removed from that home and placed in protective custody in a registered foster care facility. 73 de Larry, K3LT |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Larry Roll K3LT" wrote
Even in the case of parents, it is definitely not a good idea and should be discouraged to the greatest extent possible... Larry, When you become a parent I suspect you'll change your mind. Obviously there is an age where it is not longer appropriate, but I can assure you without reservation that having a couple of fresh bathed toddlers in 'jammies' warm from the dryer snuggle into bed between you and your spouse is one of the most beautiful rewards of parenthood that you could imagine. Until they were school age, we always let our kids to feel free to leave their beds and clamber in with us if the mood struck them. Didn't need to be some dire need of comfort from emotional stress. 73, Hans, K0HB |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article .net, "KØHB"
writes: Even in the case of parents, it is definitely not a good idea and should be discouraged to the greatest extent possible... Larry, When you become a parent I suspect you'll change your mind. Obviously there is an age where it is not longer appropriate, but I can assure you without reservation that having a couple of fresh bathed toddlers in 'jammies' warm from the dryer snuggle into bed between you and your spouse is one of the most beautiful rewards of parenthood that you could imagine. Until they were school age, we always let our kids to feel free to leave their beds and clamber in with us if the mood struck them. Didn't need to be some dire need of comfort from emotional stress. 73, Hans, K0HB Hansl: I am not a parent, and at my age I have my doubts that I'll ever be one. I come from a very large family, and like about half of my brothers and sisters, I guess I had enough child-rearing early in my life to make me not particularly curious to do any of my own. Spending most of my adult life moving from one country to another every year or two didn't help much either. However, I don't think I am totally unqualified to make a statement such as I did in the message you replied to. Children belong in their own beds, period. I listen to radio talk show and degreed, licensed family counsellor Dr. Laura Schlessinger all the time, and she has addressed this issue many times, always stating the same thing I did. Therefore, we will have to agree to disagree. All I know is, I never slept in my parent's bed as a child, for any reason, and neither did any of my 4 brothers or 4 sisters. Quite frankly, I don't know anyone who ever did. 73 de Larry, K3LT |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Larry Roll K3LT" wrote'
I listen to radio talk show and degreed, licensed family counsellor Dr. Laura Schlessinger all the time, and she has addressed this issue many times, always stating the same thing I did. Larryl, Don't believe everything you hear on the radio. Dr. Laura is wrong, and you're wrong. Colleen and I have 5 great, well adjusted children who prove you flat wrong. You're a sibling, not a parent, and you don't have even a trace of a clue. Sunuvagun. 73, de Hans (no "L" in Hans) |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Larry Roll K3LT" wrote
degreed, licensed family counsellor Dr. Laura Schlessinger all the time OBTW, Larryl, I should point out that one of our daughters, Gretchen, is also a "degreed, licensed" child counsellor, and she actually practices in the real world as opposed to chatting about it on the radio. And her three little tykes are regularly found in the same bed with their parents. Sorry, Larryl, but in this discussion you're kinda like someone arguing about Morse code but has never learned it themselves. Sunuvagun! 73, de Hans, K0HB |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Is Michael Jackson Innocent? Is KE4TEW a father of felons? YES | General | |||
FS:NOS JACKSON BROS. 2-Section Air Variables w/pics | Homebrew | |||
FS:NOS JACKSON BROS. 2-Section Air Variables w/pics | Homebrew |