Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4 Dec 2003 09:26:52 -0800, N2EY wrote:
Mistakes happen. But when you read the FCC enforcement letters, it becomes clear that mistakes, particularly technical ones, aren't really much of a problem anymore in the ARS. Technical mistakes were, and I would guess still are, handled by less formal warnings (a phone call or an Advisory Notice rather than a Notice of Violation or a Notice of Apparent Liability to Forfeiture, for instance) at least the first time around. Whatever works..... -- 73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane From a Clearing in the Silicon Forest Beaverton (Washington County) Oregon |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FS: Antique Test Equipment - collectible | Boatanchors | |||
FS: Antique Test Equipment - collectible | Boatanchors | |||
Tantalums and test eqpt. | Homebrew | |||
My response to Jim Wiley, KL7CC | Policy | |||
replace cw test with typing test! | Policy |