Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"D. Stussy" wrote in
. org: On Fri, 12 Dec 2003, Alun wrote: "D. Stussy" wrote in . org: On Fri, 12 Dec 2003, Alun wrote: "KØHB" wrote in ink.net: "N2EY" wrote in message Didn't FCC change the vanity call rules right about then? No, IIRC Gate 1 of the vanity program opened in May or June of 1996. 73, de Hans, K0HB No-code started in '92. I would expect a bump in renewals falling due from last year onwards. Wrong. Try getting your facts straight: Testing change: 2/14/1991. First no-code license issued 4/12/1991. I see, December '91 instead of some time in '92. Not exactly a huge error, is it? The first batch were all people who had taken the theory tests at Anne Arundel ARC before no-code licences were actually introduced, and so were ready to go when it came in. I think you may find that those six people had the only no-code licences issued in the US in '91! Obviously, you have other issues too. It doesn't seem as if you can read dates either (and if you were thinking of the European format for dates, then there is no 14th month, so it should have been obvious that such a format wasn't used). You're not off by a month - but by 10; almost a year, and with the number of licensees in that period, the error is significant. Other issues? Because I was mistaken about a date? Get a life! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|