Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "N2EY" wrote in message ... In article k.net, "Bill Sohl" writes: The point is that no other licensing (federal or state) takes such a position....i.e. where the additional privileges are not otherwise a function of additional knowledge required for the license. What other licensing includes things like a Basis and Purpose that the licensees are expected to fulfill? Drivers sure don't have such. Would you rather that FCC did away with the Extra, Bill? For that matter what about the General? If we adopt the philosophy, it could be done. Insane, but stranger things have happened. There are, as we have discussed, valid privileges which could be tied to the increased license knowledge. Power would be a good example (IMHO). Most of us have agreed that it makes almost no sense to have the entry level license (technician) allowed to run 1500 watts based on a knowledge base of so little technical and theory. Agreed! But FCC doesn't see it that way - yet. Bill, your argument simply points down the path of getting rid of the Extra, even if you don't intend it that way. Not at all. I'd make the Extra the only license allowed 1500 watts. Cheers, Bill K2UNK |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
NCVEC explains their licensing petition | Equipment | |||
Why You Don't Like Warmed Over Incentive Licensing | General | |||
Wonder how licensing will change... | Policy | |||
What makes a Pro code test Amateur a Troglodyte? | Policy |