| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
February 7th 04, 10:46 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Len Over 21 wrote:
In article , Dave Heil writes: Len Over 21 wrote: In article , Dave Heil confused in the east...and north...and south writes: Len Over 21 wrote: In article , Dave Heil trying to go for the jugular but getting only a juggler writes: Len Over 21 wrote: In article , (N2EY) writes: The FDA grades ham. ...leaving you to handle the degrading. I only degrade the biodegradeable amateurs in here. We're each biodegradable, Leonard. You know, the Few, the Overly-Proud, the (white) Men of the Amateur Copse waving in the breeze of their own unoriginality bravely holding to the standards and practices of 1930s amateurisms but bragging they are state of the art by buying the latest radio toy designed by someone else and built by someone else and thinking they are potential Nobel laureates for doing so. A few questions (DEMANDS) of you, Leona: What constitutes "Overly-Proud" and why is the term capitalized? Do you consider yourself to be of a racial group other than white? Do you know of anyone who has indicated that hethinks of himself as a Nobel laureate because he bought a radio transceiver which is unequalled in amateur radio equipment? You biodegradeables get your jollies not by operating them radio toys so much as acting like you are radio gods in here and snarling degredations at others who don't have your lofty opinions. Worse yet, you aren't even original in your perjoratives. You're biodegradable, Len. Your definition of "radio god" seems to be "one who is not in agreement with the views of Leonard H. Anderson". How do you determine from reading lines of typed characters, when someone is snarling? Are you snarling when you post here? Do you hold "lofty" opinions? How do you determine when the opinions of others are "lofty"? Didn't you forget my claim that I was going to invent anti-gravity? Haven't heard of that one. Don't worry too much though. It can't make you look any more foolish than your "Extra right out of the box" claim. Said that once before. You can find it in Google (you were going to cut and paste everything I ever wrote before in here...that will be included). I never wrote that I intended bringing back all of your material. Most of it wasn't that good the first time. I'm still working on anti-gravity. Something is holding me down, though. So you said earlier. Your purloined lines weren't very funny the first time. Now sit down in front of your orion, snarly dave. Amaze yourself. I do that quite frequently, Leonid. Herr Robust, you need to get some radio technology EDUCATION. ....and YOU'RE JUST THE GUY to give it to me, I'll bet. (much of your crap snipped because it was, well, crap) Success is yours ahead. Just not at the rate you are going. Amateur radio success has been mine for over 40 years now. Would you like to ruminate on your liklihood of joining the fun on the ham bands, given the rate you are going? Dave K8MN |
|
#3
February 9th 04, 10:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
(Len Over 21) wrote in message ...
After having commited himself in public with the assertion "I am only here to civilly debate the Morse Code test issue, Leonard H. Anderson embarrassed his family name with the following: In article , Dave Heil robust oberst auf das sandbox writes: No, I don't think so. You got the formaldehyde before assuming room temperature. Dr. Frankenstein would be proud...he created a Ham Monster! "...it's Alive! It's Alive!...it beeped morse code!" [from an unpublished Mary Shelley manuscript] :-) (much of your crap snipped because it was, well, crap) Right, straight talk from a Newington Charm School dropout. See 97.1 (e), something about "good will" and "uniqueness." What next? Shouts of "Drop and give me twenty, maggot?" The gunnery nurse have a cue-so with you or something? Amateur radio success has been mine for over 40 years now. Wonderful. Any time soon you will be ready to be a true professional. With another forty years of radio theory study, that is... Keep up the good work. Temper fry! Not that we're surprised. Leonard H. Anderson is a known pathological liar with a penchant for overstated accomplishments in radio communication and blatant lies about the character of his military service. Just another day on RRAP for him. Steve, K4YZ |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1400  June 11, 2004 | Dx | |||
| Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1400  June 11, 2004 | Dx | |||
| Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1398 Â May 28, 2004 | General | |||
| Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1367 – October 24 2003 | Policy | |||
| Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1353 – July 18, 2003 | General | |||
Hybrid Mode
