Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dave Heil" wrote | That's the problem though, isn't it? What we need is the statute, not the | rules, which prove nothing in the absence of Novice testing. | | So if I understand your view, you'd like to see a statute as proof that | the statute does not exist. Does that sum it up? It's clear he doesn't wish to be confused with any facts which spoil his rant. 73, de Hans, K0HB |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|