Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 11 Feb 2004 14:43:25 -0500, Mike Coslo wrote:
Alun wrote: Mike, how is it anti-US to point that the world doesn't revolve around America? Of course, if you think it does, then you're probably beyond help. It's a troll, Alun. Go post the same message anywhere on netnews and watch the reaction. Mike, I didn't take Alun's message as a troll - just a response in context to the thread to a rather lofty assertion that without the ARRL (and by definition, the US Amateur Radio Service, since that is all the ARRL influences), the world would never have known the joys of Amateur Radio. Which is just a tad jingoistic, I'd say - and nigh-on impossible to substantiate without resorting to theory, opinion and conjecture. If you don't believe it, then you're probably beyond help. Of course the world doesn't revolve around the US. The world revolves around it's axis. How is the ARRL proposal going to affect the rest of the world's amateurs anyway? It won't. Yet, according to the comments earlier in the thread, historically, without the ARRL there would be no amateur radio anywhere in the world. Really? I don't think so. - Mike KB3EIA - 73, Leo |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Leo" wrote in message news ![]() On Wed, 11 Feb 2004 14:43:25 -0500, Mike Coslo wrote: Alun wrote: Mike, how is it anti-US to point that the world doesn't revolve around America? Of course, if you think it does, then you're probably beyond help. It's a troll, Alun. Go post the same message anywhere on netnews and watch the reaction. Mike, I didn't take Alun's message as a troll - just a response in context to the thread to a rather lofty assertion that without the ARRL (and by definition, the US Amateur Radio Service, since that is all the ARRL influences), the world would never have known the joys of Amateur Radio. Which is just a tad jingoistic, I'd say - and nigh-on impossible to substantiate without resorting to theory, opinion and conjecture. If you don't believe it, then you're probably beyond help. Of course the world doesn't revolve around the US. The world revolves around it's axis. How is the ARRL proposal going to affect the rest of the world's amateurs anyway? It won't. Yet, according to the comments earlier in the thread, historically, without the ARRL there would be no amateur radio anywhere in the world. Really? I don't think so. - Mike KB3EIA - We are not saying that the ARRL was the only thing that made this happen. Simply that they were a significant player in the US and that the US was a significant player in the world. Without the ARRL, US amateurs would have had a much tougher time. If the US amateur community had been seriously weakened, it would have affect to some degree the amateur community in the rest of the world. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , "Dee D. Flint"
writes: We are not saying that the ARRL was the only thing that made this happen. Yes you are. The evidence is the constant evangelical beliefs in the ARRL doing it all for hams in the USA. Simply that they were a significant player in the US and that the US was a significant player in the world. ARRL was a relative late-comer in national amateur radio organizations in the USA. They were incorporated in 1914. The very first, and still existing radio club in the USA is the Radio Club of America, organized in 1909. Without the ARRL, US amateurs would have had a much tougher time. You are proposing a "what if" situation in an alternate universe. You have absolutely no verification of what you said above. It is your personal opinion and nothing more. If the US amateur community had been seriously weakened, it would have affect to some degree the amateur community in the rest of the world. Probably so but do not elevate the ARRL to some kind of divine order of things. Remember that other organizations were already around before the ARRL and were remarking to the U.S. federal government concerning amateur radio. Many, many more citizens of the USA were involved in this new "radio" between 1909 and 1914 and that ALL, amateurs included, had very little technological knowledge or operational experience with "radio." You cannot believably "predict" these alternate universe conditions of then anymore than you can "predict" or even "know what will happen" due to regulation changes. LHA / WMD |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|