LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #6   Report Post  
Old January 24th 04, 05:29 AM
Lloyd Davies The GREAT TIME LORD
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Dwight Stewart" wrote in message
ink.net...
"Mike" wrote:
(snip) Yet, I still would like to
know where the idea came from
about grandfathering techs with
no test.



I think you meant to say no "additional" written test, Mike. I suspect

the
idea comes from the fact that the current Technician license already

allows
HF access with the simple addition of the code test. In other words, the
current Technician license exam already covers much of the material needed
for HF access. Therefore, it makes more sense to grandfather them into a
license class with HF access than into one without. Of course, that's just
my take on it. If you really want to know why ARRL decided to do so, ask
them.


Dwight Stewart (W5NET)

http://www.qsl.net/w5net/


I agree with that answer. I had to take both the Novice and Tech written to
get my Tech no-code. So what? I think it's a great idea to get on HF!!



 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Totally ticked. ARRL Philosophy General 11 January 28th 04 04:28 AM
TOTALLY FREE - Rohn tower anti-climb W3ATV Boatanchors 0 October 13th 03 02:21 AM
TOTALLY FREE - Rohn tower anti-climb W3ATV Boatanchors 0 October 13th 03 02:21 AM
(Totally Uninformed) Newbie: Cellular to RF Scott Unit 69 General 9 August 19th 03 02:36 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:41 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017