In article , "Dee D. Flint"
writes:

Exactly. Which is why I killfiled him and so see only what others may
choose to quote from him. Thank goodness!!

Tsk, tsk, tsk, hiding from truth, freedom, and independence.

Perverse mental activity. Ostrich syndrome.

Hide head in sand and all you can hear is the drumbeats of the league
making you tap in time to only their loud music, the rhythm of olde-
time hamme radio as it was. It shields you from realization that there
are others out there who do not agree with you. It is safe, secure,
warm, comforting, makes you feel very superior to shut out all other
independent thought.

Tyrants love the ostrich syndrome. Plays right into their rule.

LHA / WMD

In article , (N2EY)
writes:

In article , "Dee D. Flint"
writes:

Len has made no effort that anyone can see to get an
amateur license.

Len does not want an amateur radio license.

Incorrect. I have no pressing need to get one.

He appears to want to make changes without being a member
of the affected group.

He wants amateur radio as we know it to disappear.

That's partly true. TAFKA Rv.Jim wants U.S. amateur radio to
remain in the standards and practices of the 1930s. He wants
to keep a Living Museum of Archaic Radio Skills.

He loves the idea of Seven Year Old Amateur Extras, his
"fellows" as he said in another post.

What he wants is a multiband high power version of cb.

Highly incorrect. Shame!

Removal of the morse code test will not be The End Of The
Amateur World, simply the dismay of olde-tyme hammes who
can no longer use morsemanship for one-upmanship on fellow
ham children.

Or nothing at all.

Highly incorrect again.

He also appears to enjoy insulting and berating anyone who is
not in complete agree with his opinions.

Highly incorrect again.

The hidebound, stubborn olde-tyme hammes who appear in here
get replies "that seem to write themselves."

There's a complete
description of his behavior around someplace - he proves its
correctness with each of his posts...

Poor baby. Can't get your love and affection on the newsgroup?
Cure it by doing character assassination of the most [expletive
deleted] kind, insult and demean all those who desire freedom
and independent thought.

It's rather like complaining about your congressman
when you don't bother to vote.

His hobby is wasting time. Your time.

Tyrants WILL consider defense of the First Amendment as "a waste
of time." They always do.

You waste time with character assassination. Not very Catholic.

LHA / WMD

In article , (Mr.
Inexhaustible who does not meet exhaust emission standards N2EY) writes:

In article , Leo

writes:

On 6 Feb 2004 15:18:39 -0800, (N2EY) wrote:

Leo wrote in message
...
On 06 Feb 2004 14:54:40 GMT, (N2EY) wrote:

In article , Leo

writes:

in Canada, as we grant full Amateur license privileges upon
request to persons with appropriate Professional license
qualifications.

snip

And, if you make a few mistakes along the way, or if it takes a week
to get it running, so what?

Depends on the mistake.

Well, other than operating out of band, there ain't much that a
"sorry" wouldn't cover!

So when somebody decides to run ten or twenty times the legal power,
a "sorry" is supposed to cover it? Or when somebody uses ham radio
for commercial purposes, or music, etc.. a "sorry" is supposed to cover it?

Sorry, that's not good enough.

Are you considering capital punishment as the only cure for not
zealously following the standards and practices of the 1930s as
the league constantly reminds you?

Perhaps you wish excommunication from talking about a hobby
concerning communication?

What are you hinting at, mighty warrior of purity against [expletive
deleteds] ?

You're experimenting, and that's what
amateur radio is all about.

Then why have any ham radio tests or licenses at all? You're arguing
for the end of all testing for a ham license, Leo.

Not at all -

Yes, you are. If a "sorry" can cover most violations, there's no need for
most of the tests.

...except the morse code test MUST be there, forever and ever. :-)

I'm suggesting that (many of) the radio skills acquired
in the acquisition of a commercial license are directly applicable to
the Amateur service. Transferrable skills.

Maybe. But most of what a ham needs to know is not covered by a
commercial license test.

No problem. The amateur tests don't require any rules and regs
required by commercial broadcasters. Isn't that even enough?

Now, make a couple of mistakes and knock WNEP-TV off the air for a
couple of minutes - you might be an unemployed professional!

Which acts as an incentive to know what you're doing.

Yup!

Does WNEP-TV change frequency, or have to listen first before
transmitting?

That is a pretty simple skill - I'm sure the broadcast engineers could
figure it out rather quickly :)

I don't think so. They're used to doing all the talking and none of the
listening.

Commercial broadcasters are required by LAW and the terms of
their license to STAY on their allocated frequencies.

Commercial carrier services on HF are usually allocated several
frequencies to use on HF. A QSY is NOT any technical hurdle
requiring years of experience to learn, to take tests for, or any
of that nonsense. Did that a half century ago. No problem.

and the Pros have made a career of it

All that means is that they get paid. There are some ladies and
gentlemen
on the streets of most major cities who make a "profession" out of
something
most people do as amateurs. (Some say it's the oldest profession).

Politicians? :)

Some say politicians are a subset of the oldest profession. ;-)

Fully agreed! :)

So we should listen to those professionals?

If you don't want to listen to law-making, law-enforcing professionals,
you are free to listen to Bubba 24/7 in your cell. No problem.

Your choice.

Those people must be qualified to give advice on the subject of their
profession,
don't you think? ;-) We should revere what they say and do, and not
question their knowledge and opinions on the subject, right? ;-) ;-)
They
must be better at it than us unpaid amateurs because they get paid to
do it, right? ;-) ;-) ;-)

I'll take your word for it, having no personal experience with the
profession that you are referring to. If you say they're good, Jim,
then they're good! :)

I wouldn't know - I'm only an amateur in that field too.

Generally speaking, though, professionals are more knowledgable than
lay people because they are involved in their field full time, and are
held to standards of conduct and proficiency set by not only the
regulators but by their employers.

Generally speaking. However, commercial radio and amateur radio are
different fields. Being a "professional in radio", by itself, is no
indication of qualification to operate an amateur radio station, and
even less of an
indication of qualification to determine amateur radio policy.

Two different concepts.

That's right. Amateur radio and commercial radio are two different concepts.

Right...and in your world, the amateur physics are different along
with the hardware. Yawn...

Being a licensed professional in radio implies a knowledge of radio
theory and concepts - many of which are tranferrable from one area
(commercial) to another (amateur).

Some. Not many.

Of course you KNOW that by experience in commercial HF
communications.

Right.

By nature, amateur activities have
much greater margins for error than professional ones - they are hobby
based, after all!

Then why have licenses at all?

Good question.

Without a license to brag about, there would be fewer hams and a
lot more space to play radio in on HF. Sounds like a good thing.

The sandbox would be more open and free for all the seven year
old extras to play in...

Amateur radio policy, on the other hand, is made by legislators, none
of whom require any knowledge of radio to carry out the
responsibilities of their office.

They need to understand certain concepts of radio in order to do the job.
Doesn't mean they all do.

Impossible. The glory and majesty of amateur radio cannot possibly
be understood by filthy immoral professionals! Shame on them!

Why, [expletive deleted] and let them [expletive deleted] !

And, rather than just sounding like
experts, they are expected to demonstrate their proficiency - that's
what they get paid for! 'Stay current or move out' is the rule of the
technically-oriented workplace.

Current with what? Most TV stations are still broadcasting NTSC
signals, based
on a mode that's at least 50 years old. If you don't care about color,
a 1946
NTSC TV (if you can find one that works) is still usable. Then there's
FM
broadcasting which is about as old and good old MW AM, which goes back
to the
1920s.

With equipment that is vastly more complex than what the average
amateur is using, though.

So what? They don;t have to buy it with their own money, nor take
care of it with their own money in their spare time. Amateurs do.
Makes all the difference in the world.

Right! Amateurs are the most noble, god-fearing, honest folks in
the world, to a man upholders of social morals, the ten
commandments, and all give tithes more than ten percent!

Filthy evil money-grubbing professionals don't have families or bills
or loved ones or any expenses. They probalby drink, smoke, and
cuss, showing indecency at football games and everything!

You ought to work at league headquarters where they built all
their home-designed rigs just like you did.

If you get the opportunity, have a look
inside a cellular base station sometime - all of the equipment in
there is computer controlled

Which means no licensed operators are needed at all.

Blasphemy! Say not those evil words!

All must be licensed, tested, analyzed for proper moral virtue, and
be subject to hellfire and brimstone if they so much as hint at any
unlicenseness!

Elimination of operators has been a major goal of commercial and
military radio services for years. One less warm body to pay. Just
like the railroads eliminated most block operators years ago, and the
telephone company went to dial equipment, and the airlines went to
planes that can be flown by two, not three.

Haven't you realized it? It's all a vast conspiracy against morse code!

The only ones who use it are the amateurs (glory be their name,
hosannahs in the highest for those virtuous, noble, standard-bearing
leaders of the state of the art in all radio).

Oh, and the U.S. Army Signal Corps is the third most populous
branch in the Army despite no use of morse code for any military
communications. A larger percentage now than in WW2 when
morse code was still used by the military.

American railroads have more radios (none of them morse mode) now
than ever before, are required to channelize very close together in
order to fit within the allocations. NTIA has the facts and figures.
For wired communications they have high-speed data and some use
encrypted modes for security.

American airline companies have shown the rest of the world how to
run profit-making air carriers, both passenger and cargo. They have
NO need for morse modes over civil land air routes, have never had any
internationally since 1955 and abandoned HF morse CW for SSB and
data modes long ago out of practicality of USE, not for warm body
elimination in aircrew. Upon inspection of professional air carriers,
where the once carried an "extra" aircrew for morse comms, they
STILL carry "extra" aircrew in the same number for other flight duties.

As to practicality in use, which would you think a business would
want for written communications: A "high speed" pair of morse
men capable of 40 WPM or a data/teleprinter circuit useable by anyone
who can read and write running a over a hundred times faster?

If public safety is such a concern at sea, why did SOLAS and the
maritime community devise, adopt GMDSS instead of manual
morsemen "sparkies" doing code on 500 KHz? GMDSS can be
operated by any trained, certified ship's crew, not a specialist in
morse.

- nothing even resembling a piece of
radio gear to be seen.

Only if you don't know what it looks like ;-)

None of it looks like a K2 or an Orion.

Cell sites operate at the 1 GHz band and higher. "Real hams" don't
go near microwaves. "Gigahertz for gigasquirts" - KH2D

The signal out, though, is Hertzian, and as old as the universe....

If it's as old as the universe, it existed before Hertz.

It isn't "real radio" if above 30 MHz. - CW (Conventional Wisdom) of the
olde-tyme mighty macho morsemen.

snip

Sure, but according to IC, that isn't a concern!

IC is just wrong.

Tsk, tsk, next thing you will be accusing Industry Canada of having
Weapons of Mass Destruction!

And are professional licensees allowed to build their own transmitters
and put
them
on the air without any certification?

Nope - this is what the Amateur bands are for (type approval not
required, unlike the commercial frequencies).

Then the "pros" aren't necessarily qualified in that area, either.

In fact, there are precious few Amateurs left who could do that, Jim,
even though our bands permit it.

I can, and have.

I know - but they just ain't making them like you anymore!

Yes, they are. There are plenty of hams like me around, building,
operating, using Morse code....That sort of thing really bothers
some people.

Only when they want to force their Lifestyle on everyone else.

They won't let things be. They must Convert the heathen NCTAs.

They get all hot and bothered when everyone else doesn't worship
and adore the things they do (obviously superior things according
to them).


Canada may be different. But I don't live there.

Same, actually. 100 questions, 60 correct gets you a basic license.

60% passing? At least here it's ~74%.

Yah, here we go with the Territorial Imperative nonsense again...


You seem to be arguing that such licenses aren't really needed
anymore.

No - I'm arguing that they are becoming meaningless - simple memory
work that a child can do.

If they're meaningless they aren't needed.

Right...SEVEN YEAR OLD EXTRAS IN THE USA.

Wow, certified, stamped, authorized, qualified infantile behavior, legal
to run 1+ KW transmitters without parental supervision!


Has the licensing of young children caused any problems for the ARS?
Are they making a mess of the bands?

The mentally-seven-year-olds seem to be doing just fine. Every
so often they appear in the "Riley notices."

btw, Canada used to have an age requirement of 15 for any class of
amateur license. Would you have them put that requirement back?

The USA never had an age requirement for a ham license, but at
least one frequent poster here petitioned the FCC to add an age requirement
of 14 years. Fortunately the FCC did not do so.

Right. FREEDOM for seven-year-old Extras!

You show them!

Too easy, I'd say,

The FCC disagrees.

Unfortunately.

They're PROFESSIONALS, Leo! They have to "keep current or move out",
right?
It's their JOB to know what's needed, right? Who are we poor dumb old
broken
down amateurs to question them? ;-)

They are regulators and politicians, actually....

They're still PROFESSIONALS IN RADIO. Who are you or I to question them? ;-)

I thought SEVEN-YEAR-OLD EXTRAS ranking any radio professional
as cute. You apparently support that in all things?

Must not question the professionals. Their egos can't take it.

Well, I'm sure that if you asked a holder of a first class radio
license who has worked in the field for years a radio theory question,
they'd probably get it right! :)

I've seen them get it wrong. Some don't even know what firmware is.

Right. You tell them mighty professional...you don't what "firmware"
really is! (downloadable software from Ten-Tec).


How often does the average employee at WNEP have to demonstrate
knowledge
of calculation of squares, logs and complex numbers?

The receptionist - never. The hands-on technical people - rarely -
but they would need it to complete their formal education in radio
theory, I'd reckon.

Is formal education necessary for the license?

Are you going to brush the ivy leaves from your BS again? :-)

You didn't get your mighty morse Extra with a BS and MS, did
you? :-)

Rote memorization was what my point was about, though - and I'm sure
that was the case.

How do you know for sure?

I don't - but I'd say the odds are pretty heavily in my favour. :)

They are - but you wrote as if there were no other possibility.

My, my, Leo writes an indefenite and TAFKA Rv. Jim says its
an absolute! Gotta love the double-degreed word misunderstanding.


Ever talk to a 7-year old kid, Jim?

At least daily.

Listen often too?

At least daily.

Keep those SEVEN-YEAR-OLD EXTRA CLASS skills honed sharp!


Much of what's on the test (band edges, regs) is pure memory stuff.

Thought the Extra was more theoretical than regulation based?

None of them are heavy on theory. Not anymore.

Sigh...maybe "Now You're Talking" will be replaced by Mother Goose?


But you're not 7!

I'm not 13 either.

Right. You are 49 going on 94.

Seven year old Extras now have ALL the rights your Extra license has.

There's no legal requirement for parental supervision when they run
1+ KW transmitters.


And there is *no* requirement that *any* ham understand complex
numbers.

There is, if he really wants to figure out why his 50 ohm antenna has
an SWR of 2.6 to 1......

Not at all.

And why would a 50 ohm antenna have such a high SWR if it's 50 ohms?

Right. All Seven-year-old Extras KNOW that stuff!


Wrong is wrong. But the IC are professionals, aren't they?

Yep - professional regulators. Them who makes the rules!

PROFESSIONALS IN RADIO!!!

Nooooo. Professionals in LAW. Absolutely NO Commissioner or
staff member of the FCC is required to possess ANY radio operator
license. Read Parts 0 and 1 of Title 47 C.F.R.

You ought to research Industry Canada's organization and charter
some more before tossing sand from your sandbox at them. If you
don't know our FCC then how can you "critique" Industry Canada?
You don't even live in Canada.

Personally I'd think, for example, that the guy who sits in a control
tower accurately vectoring planes all over our busy airspace is far
better equipped to carry on a two-way conversation on 2-meters than
the average amateur who passed a relatively simple test!

Maybe. But there's no requirement that he have any sort of radio
operator's license. He doesn't need to know how the radios work.
Complex numbers?

They aren'r required - you just told me that....

Exactly. Nor band edges, or power limits, etc.

Tested morse code ability MUST be there for HF. Always. It
transcends any theory of radio.


No. I'm too busy looking at rigs and parts.

Look up - he's there, along with the guys who look like the local
homeless shelter burnt down!

Gee, you sure have a high opinion of your fellow hams.

How about those "fellow" seven year olds?

For the USA to make the
same mistake would be a very bad thing, unless the GROL tests were
changed.
Even then it would be questionable, because it would probably be
possible

for someone to pass the Commercial exam but get all the
amateur-radio-related
questions wrong. Such a person is simply not qualified to operate an
amateur
radio station.

...unless they can find a 7-year old to elmer them, that is. That is
some prettty tough material to master! LOL!

Would you talk that way to a 7 year old, Leo?

Why not?

How much time *do* you spend with children?

That's important now that SEVEN YEAR OLDS can be EXTRAS!

LHA / WMD

In article , "Dee D. Flint"
writes:

At least they have to take the initiative to request it and that would make
all the difference. Len has made no effort that anyone can see to get an
amateur license. He appears to want to make changes without being a member
of the affected group. It's rather like complaining about your congressman
when you don't bother to vote.

Mama Dee, as a doting parent to errant children, why don't you
demand abrogation of the First Amendment?

Strike all that nonsense about citizens petitioning their government
unless they are a PART of govrnment!

Nobody will be allowed to have ANY grievances about anything they
are not IN!

That's the AMATEUR WAY!

Anyone not a League member is just a Problem! Tsk, tsk, tsk.

Ya gotta love all this Amateur Democracy in action stuff!

LHA / WMD

In article , Robert Casey
writes:

Len, just get the dammed license. It's more fun to operate then to
whine.....

You mean WHINE about non-amateur subjects like sex and
contemporary social-sexual morality?

Was I doing that without an amateur radio license?!? :-)

Good heavens, call Riley, call Powell, excommunicate me from
the Catholic Church!

Yes, you're right...an amateur radio license is required in order to
talk about Super Bowl halftimes and "indecent exposure."

That's a very important amateur radio policy topic.

You should make Janet Jackson take a morse code test!

That would cure her of her "indecency!"

[there's never been a case of indecent exposure on the HF ham bands!]

LHA / WMD

In article , Dave Heil
writes:

After more than seven
years of posting your diatribes in an amateur radio newsgroup, you're no
closer to obtaining even the most basic no-code amateur radio license.

There's NO test required to access or post to newsgroups.

Why should I get an amateur radio license to operate a computer?

I've been operating computers since the 1970s...about two decades
after I first transmitted on HF with a 1 KW transmitter.

You've had too many oriongasms. Stop it or you will grow more
blind.

LHA / WMD

In article , Leo
writes:

Wonder why it's called a reciprocal agreement when it isn't quite
reciprocal? :)

Perhaps because so many America-firsters want to be "one
over everyone else?" :-)

LHA / WMD

Len Over 21 wrote:

In article , Dave Heil
writes:

What does that say about your vaunted federal merit badge?

It says that a mere child is one up on you. She has the badge. You
don't.

I'm not a SEVEN YEAR OLD Extra.

Precisely. You're not ANY kind of Extra or any kind of radio amateur.

If you think that a SEVEN YEAR OLD has anything "up" on me,
I'd say you have the mentality of a seven year old.

The facts are the A seven-year-old has an Amateur Extra. You do
not.

Now go out to the sandbox and play with your "fellow Extras" in
the First Grade. That's a nice boy. Behave or Mama Dee will
spank you for being naughty.

Aren't you the guy whose wife is scolding him for playing with
seven-year-olds?

Dave K8MN

Hi, Len,

after reading through your last 25 posts to 10 threads, and did not find anything useful, exept wrong spelled english and german, but nothing about Amateur Radio Policy, I have to ask you directly about one very important thing.

What impact will Broadband over Powerlines, or PLC, have on the Amateur Radio Policy.

Thank you in advance for your honest and honorable answer, which I will take from you as the only one expert in Amateur Radio Policy and the Moderator of this Newsgroup. Please take my apology for the poor quoting habits, I am not jet skilled enough in this magic art.

Please don't cite me impatient, but may I await your reply soon? Today?

Best regards
Helmut

Len Over 21 wrote:

Oh, but I'm very much a part of U.S. amateur radio and I've been part of
amateur radio in five other countries. You aren't part of amateur radio
anywhere on the planet. You aren't a part of the ARRL. Your
connections to amateur radio are simply that you've commented to the FCC
about the service in which you do not participate and that you post
here.

Oh, my, another tyrant ranting away.

Tyrant? For pointing out facts? Go over that paragraph again.
Anything there you'd like to dispute?

The FCC is "not a part of amateur radio," merely the regulation of
every civil radio service in the United States.

1. The FCC regulates amateur radio. FCC staffers are paid to do so.
So at least some individuals at the FCC are involved in amateur
radio.

2. I am a radio amateur. Thus I am involved in amateur radio.

3. You are not a radio amateur and you are not employed by the FCC.
You have nothing to do with amateur radio.

The First Amendment gives me a number of rights. Exclusion from
discussing those with anyone or my government is NOT under your
control. Not at any time, herr tyrant.

When was it that you were excluded? You "discussed" (albeit one-way,
from you to the FCC) with your government. Now, force the FCC to listen
or act on your views. Maybe you can claim that your First Amendment
Rights were abridged.

There are mechanisms in the U.S. Constitution for removing the
rights of citizens. Those are called "amendments." Do you think
you could ever, with or without force, make such an amenedment?

I have no desire to make an "amenedment", you "synchophant". Why are
you so "beligerent", "Atila"?

Why do you keep trying to be a tyrant?

I'm not. I'm waiting for a group decision from you on whether or not
I've achieved radio god status.

Is that due to some mental illness? If so, get help fast.

You keep accusing others of mental illness. Ask you wife what it means
when you begin to believe that others are crazy.

Now be a good boy and go our and play in the radio sandbox with
your other "fellow hams." I hear the seven-year-old extra is nice.

We're pretty near the gist of things. There are ninety-five-old hams.
There are twelve-year-old hams. There are folks in their thirties,
forties, fifties, sixties and seventies who are hams. Those of us in
the (amateur) radio sandbox play together pretty well. You aren't one
of those hams and you don't play well with others. You can sit alone in
your sandbox.

Dave K8MN

Len Over 21 wrote:

In article , "Dee D. Flint"
writes:

Exactly. Which is why I killfiled him and so see only what others may
choose to quote from him. Thank goodness!!

Tsk, tsk, tsk, hiding from truth, freedom, and independence.

Perverse mental activity. Ostrich syndrome.

You provide truth, freedom and independence? Maybe I'm missing
something in your posts.

Hide head in sand and all you can hear is the drumbeats of the league
making you tap in time to only their loud music, the rhythm of olde-
time hamme radio as it was. It shields you from realization that there
are others out there who do not agree with you. It is safe, secure,
warm, comforting, makes you feel very superior to shut out all other
independent thought.

Dee has built a privacy hedge around her cozy home so she doesn't have
to view the ugly landfill. You are the landfill.

Tyrants love the ostrich syndrome. Plays right into their rule.

Yeah, I hear Saddam Hussein was quite the Ostrich man.

Dave K8MN

Helmut wrote:

Hi, Len,

after reading through your last 25 posts to 10 threads, and did not find
anything useful, exept wrong spelled english and german, but nothing
about Amateur Radio Policy, I have to ask you directly about one very
important thing.

Please don't expect Lennyboy to ever have anything useful to say, that
would be too much of a strain on the poor old man.

On 8 Feb 2004 18:21:54 GMT, Alun wrote:

snip

Have the Canadian rules changed? The last time I read it you had to be both
a US citizen and a US resident to qualify. I'm not an American (or a
Canadian either) so I couldn't operate in Canada using my US call.

The rules I read were certainly not reciprocal, though. An American with a
US call and residing in the US could operate in Canada for only 2 months
within the terms of the nearest Canadian licence (No WARC bands or 40m for
Generals!), whereas a Canadian with a Canadian call could operate
indefinitely in the US, even living here permanently, under the terms of
their Canadian licence (not to exceed Extra).

Not sure if they have changed, Alun - just discovered them when I
bacame a ham a couple of years ago! The link to the RAC page with
info on the current reciprocal agreement is:

http://www.rac.ca/regulatory/rcip.htm

and IC RIC-3, which contains the details on the various agreements, US
and other, is at:

http://strategis.ic.gc.ca/epic/internet/insmt-gst.nsf/vwapj/ric3.pdf/$FILE/ric3.pdf

From what I read in these documents, one need only possess a US
licence to gain full Canadian privileges appropriate to the licence
class. For countries other than the US, CEPT and IARP permits are
acceptable.

Hope that helps!

73, Leo

Leo wrote in
:

On 8 Feb 2004 18:21:54 GMT, Alun wrote:

snip

Have the Canadian rules changed? The last time I read it you had to be
both a US citizen and a US resident to qualify. I'm not an American (or
a Canadian either) so I couldn't operate in Canada using my US call.

The rules I read were certainly not reciprocal, though. An American
with a US call and residing in the US could operate in Canada for only
2 months within the terms of the nearest Canadian licence (No WARC
bands or 40m for Generals!), whereas a Canadian with a Canadian call
could operate indefinitely in the US, even living here permanently,
under the terms of their Canadian licence (not to exceed Extra).

Not sure if they have changed, Alun - just discovered them when I
bacame a ham a couple of years ago! The link to the RAC page with
info on the current reciprocal agreement is:

http://www.rac.ca/regulatory/rcip.htm

and IC RIC-3, which contains the details on the various agreements, US
and other, is at:

http://strategis.ic.gc.ca/epic/internet/insmt-gst.nsf/vwapj/ric3.pdf/$FI
LE/ric3.pdf

From what I read in these documents, one need only possess a US
licence to gain full Canadian privileges appropriate to the licence
class. For countries other than the US, CEPT and IARP permits are
acceptable.

Hope that helps!

73, Leo

I will have a look at those documents, but it would appear to be a change.
I was told by Industry Canada that they would not enforce the citizenship
requirement anyway under the old rules, but I didn't feel very secure to
rely on that!

73, Alun

Leo wrote in
:

On 8 Feb 2004 18:21:54 GMT, Alun wrote:

snip

Have the Canadian rules changed? The last time I read it you had to be
both a US citizen and a US resident to qualify. I'm not an American (or
a Canadian either) so I couldn't operate in Canada using my US call.

The rules I read were certainly not reciprocal, though. An American
with a US call and residing in the US could operate in Canada for only
2 months within the terms of the nearest Canadian licence (No WARC
bands or 40m for Generals!), whereas a Canadian with a Canadian call
could operate indefinitely in the US, even living here permanently,
under the terms of their Canadian licence (not to exceed Extra).

Not sure if they have changed, Alun - just discovered them when I
bacame a ham a couple of years ago! The link to the RAC page with
info on the current reciprocal agreement is:

http://www.rac.ca/regulatory/rcip.htm

and IC RIC-3, which contains the details on the various agreements, US
and other, is at:

http://strategis.ic.gc.ca/epic/internet/insmt-gst.nsf/vwapj/ric3.pdf/$FI
LE/ric3.pdf

From what I read in these documents, one need only possess a US
licence to gain full Canadian privileges appropriate to the licence
class. For countries other than the US, CEPT and IARP permits are
acceptable.

Hope that helps!

73, Leo

The first page talks about 'Americans operating in Canada', but I am not an
American, just someone with a US licence! That is the problem.

Reading further, RIC-2 limits operation under the bilateral agreement to US
citizens who are US residents, just as the previous rules did.

However, in RIC-3 it says that operating in Canada is possible under CEPT.

I cannot use my US licence under CEPT, as the CEPT letter that the FCC
publish says that it is only valid for US citizens (I've no idea why, as
the CEPT treaty does not mention citizenship anywhere).

However, if I got my UK licence re-activated it would automatically be
valid in Canada under CEPT. Someone who wasn't British would still be able
to do that, although I am actually a British citizen. I often go across the
border to Windsor when I visit Detroit, but I have never operated on the
Canadian side. It seems if I did so it would have to be as VE3/G8VUK, after
first getting my UK licence back.

73 de Alun, N3KIP

On 9 Feb 2004 06:12:11 GMT, Alun wrote:

Leo wrote in
:

On 8 Feb 2004 18:21:54 GMT, Alun wrote:

snip

Have the Canadian rules changed? The last time I read it you had to be
both a US citizen and a US resident to qualify. I'm not an American (or
a Canadian either) so I couldn't operate in Canada using my US call.


The rules I read were certainly not reciprocal, though. An American
with a US call and residing in the US could operate in Canada for only
2 months within the terms of the nearest Canadian licence (No WARC
bands or 40m for Generals!), whereas a Canadian with a Canadian call
could operate indefinitely in the US, even living here permanently,
under the terms of their Canadian licence (not to exceed Extra).

Not sure if they have changed, Alun - just discovered them when I
bacame a ham a couple of years ago! The link to the RAC page with
info on the current reciprocal agreement is:

http://www.rac.ca/regulatory/rcip.htm

and IC RIC-3, which contains the details on the various agreements, US
and other, is at:

http://strategis.ic.gc.ca/epic/internet/insmt-gst.nsf/vwapj/ric3.pdf/$FI
LE/ric3.pdf

From what I read in these documents, one need only possess a US
licence to gain full Canadian privileges appropriate to the licence
class. For countries other than the US, CEPT and IARP permits are
acceptable.

Hope that helps!

73, Leo

The first page talks about 'Americans operating in Canada', but I am not an
American, just someone with a US licence! That is the problem.

Reading further, RIC-2 limits operation under the bilateral agreement to US
citizens who are US residents, just as the previous rules did.

You're right - I missed that completely. I should have looked it up
RIC-2 as well, I suppose!


However, in RIC-3 it says that operating in Canada is possible under CEPT.

I cannot use my US licence under CEPT, as the CEPT letter that the FCC
publish says that it is only valid for US citizens (I've no idea why, as
the CEPT treaty does not mention citizenship anywhere).

However, if I got my UK licence re-activated it would automatically be
valid in Canada under CEPT. Someone who wasn't British would still be able
to do that, although I am actually a British citizen. I often go across the
border to Windsor when I visit Detroit, but I have never operated on the
Canadian side. It seems if I did so it would have to be as VE3/G8VUK, after
first getting my UK licence back.

Which seems like a pretty cumbersome process - I wonder why the
citizenship rules were placed in the US/Canada agreement? One would
think that the licence would be sufficient to prove competence, and
residency to prove QTH...


73 de Alun, N3KIP

73, Leo

In article ,
(Steve Robeson, K4CAP) writes:

y'aint talking about Lennie, are you?

Just last week he adamantly stated he had NO interest in Amateur
Radio beyond antagonizing this NG over the Code issue, which he
himself can't seem to stay focused on...

Steve,

Since Mr. Anderson has made his purpose here quite clear, why do
you continue to bother with him? All that does is reinforce his behavior.
You've raised kids - you obviously know that rewarding behavior is
a good way to get more of it. And often the "reward" is simply giving
your attention.

73 de Jim, N2EY

Alun wrote in message . ..
Leo wrote in
:

On 8 Feb 2004 18:21:54 GMT, Alun wrote:

snip

Have the Canadian rules changed? The last time I read it you had to be
both a US citizen and a US resident to qualify. I'm not an American (or
a Canadian either) so I couldn't operate in Canada using my US call.

The rules I read were certainly not reciprocal, though. An American
with a US call and residing in the US could operate in Canada for only
2 months within the terms of the nearest Canadian licence (No WARC
bands or 40m for Generals!), whereas a Canadian with a Canadian call
could operate indefinitely in the US, even living here permanently,
under the terms of their Canadian licence (not to exceed Extra).

Not sure if they have changed, Alun - just discovered them when I
bacame a ham a couple of years ago! The link to the RAC page with
info on the current reciprocal agreement is:

http://www.rac.ca/regulatory/rcip.htm

and IC RIC-3, which contains the details on the various agreements, US
and other, is at:

http://strategis.ic.gc.ca/epic/internet/insmt-gst.nsf/vwapj/ric3.pdf/$FI
LE/ric3.pdf

From what I read in these documents, one need only possess a US
licence to gain full Canadian privileges appropriate to the licence
class. For countries other than the US, CEPT and IARP permits are
acceptable.

Hope that helps!

73, Leo

The first page talks about 'Americans operating in Canada', but I am not an
American, just someone with a US licence! That is the problem.

Reading further, RIC-2 limits operation under the bilateral agreement to US
citizens who are US residents, just as the previous rules did.

However, in RIC-3 it says that operating in Canada is possible under CEPT.

I cannot use my US licence under CEPT, as the CEPT letter that the FCC
publish says that it is only valid for US citizens (I've no idea why, as
the CEPT treaty does not mention citizenship anywhere).

However, if I got my UK licence re-activated it would automatically be
valid in Canada under CEPT. Someone who wasn't British would still be able
to do that, although I am actually a British citizen. I often go across the
border to Windsor when I visit Detroit, but I have never operated on the
Canadian side. It seems if I did so it would have to be as VE3/G8VUK, after
first getting my UK licence back.

AND you'd be able to run ssb below 7.100. Fancy that. Huge burden relieved. Move.

73 de Alun, N3KIP

w3rv

(Brian Kelly) wrote in
om:

Alun wrote in message
. ..
Leo wrote in
:

On 8 Feb 2004 18:21:54 GMT, Alun wrote:

snip

Have the Canadian rules changed? The last time I read it you had to
be both a US citizen and a US resident to qualify. I'm not an
American (or a Canadian either) so I couldn't operate in Canada
using my US call.

The rules I read were certainly not reciprocal, though. An American
with a US call and residing in the US could operate in Canada for
only 2 months within the terms of the nearest Canadian licence (No
WARC bands or 40m for Generals!), whereas a Canadian with a Canadian
call could operate indefinitely in the US, even living here
permanently, under the terms of their Canadian licence (not to
exceed Extra).

Not sure if they have changed, Alun - just discovered them when I
bacame a ham a couple of years ago! The link to the RAC page with
info on the current reciprocal agreement is:

http://www.rac.ca/regulatory/rcip.htm

and IC RIC-3, which contains the details on the various agreements,
US and other, is at:

http://strategis.ic.gc.ca/epic/inter...wapj/ric3.pdf/
$FI LE/ric3.pdf

From what I read in these documents, one need only possess a US
licence to gain full Canadian privileges appropriate to the licence
class. For countries other than the US, CEPT and IARP permits are
acceptable.

Hope that helps!

73, Leo

The first page talks about 'Americans operating in Canada', but I am
not an American, just someone with a US licence! That is the problem.

Reading further, RIC-2 limits operation under the bilateral agreement
to US citizens who are US residents, just as the previous rules did.

However, in RIC-3 it says that operating in Canada is possible under
CEPT.

I cannot use my US licence under CEPT, as the CEPT letter that the FCC
publish says that it is only valid for US citizens (I've no idea why,
as the CEPT treaty does not mention citizenship anywhere).

However, if I got my UK licence re-activated it would automatically be
valid in Canada under CEPT. Someone who wasn't British would still be
able to do that, although I am actually a British citizen. I often go
across the border to Windsor when I visit Detroit, but I have never
operated on the Canadian side. It seems if I did so it would have to
be as VE3/G8VUK, after first getting my UK licence back.

AND you'd be able to run ssb below 7.100. Fancy that. Huge burden
relieved. Move.

73 de Alun, N3KIP

w3rv


Anyone would try to think you were trying to get rid of me, LOL!

Dave Heil wrote in message ...
Brian Kelly wrote:

Dave Heil wrote in message ...
Brian Kelly wrote:

Young Don Newell was the crucifer one Sunday at St. Andrew's Episcopal
Church in Oak Hill. After the processional and after my father had
begun the service, Don fished a tiny crystal radio from his cassock,
stuffed the earphone into his ear and attached a wire with an alligator
clip to the cross. As the service ended, my dad whispered to him, "I'd
like a word after church".

Yeah, I'll bet there was a "word or two"!

You brought back a lot of hilarious memories of "electronerd
educations" gone awry David. Gawd we had fun . . !

The best I've ever heard was deliverd at the Dayton banquet one year by
Jean Shepherd.

I'd love to read it if his talk has been archived somewhere. I'll bet
that if some Shepherd-type individual went out and compiled tales
about all the goofy stunts and missteps kid hams got into back when in
a book it would sell.

Well, in my case it was a one-time Christmas deal--the one BIG present
and that was second-hand from Allied's big, used equipment list. The
receiver I saved for was also from the same list.

I wonder if there are any Allied employees left from the days when
they were in the ham biz.

More newspaper
deliveries, an after-school job at the local hobby shop several days
each week and the writing of a sports column for the local newspaper
provided coaxial cable and connectors, a key, antenna wire and the
like.

My first store-bought rcvr was a new Hallicrafters S-40B. Which I
bought from Sears & Roebuck believe it or not. At the time Sears sold
the S-38, the S-40, and a couple higher-end Hallicrafters rcvrs. I
think one of 'em was the SX-71. The S-40 catalog price was $119.95.
But I had an aunt who lived in Chicago and worked for Sears so I was
able to get her employee's 10% discount. A whole twelve bucks. I was
as interested in SWLing as much as I was into becoming a Novice so I
spent more time chasing SW BC "rare ones" than I did tuning the W1AW
code practice sessions. Eventually though, maybe a year after I got
the rcvr I had 7.5 wpm down cold and was close to 10 wpm so I trundled
off downtown, took the test and put the S-40 to the real task.

Some of that money was also spent on a big U.S. call area map and
some (sorry, no choice of color) QSL cards from WRL.

Now yer really rubbing it in . . . The Globe King, the King of the
Hill . . ! I understand that Leo is now 93 and is still at it at.

...and ran the W3KT outgoing QSL forwarding service for a number of
years.

I forgot all about that, tnx.

I used Jesse's outgoing card forwarding service in the days preceeding
the ARRL's outgoing bureau.

I knew it existed but I wasn't active in that timeframe.

Speaking of QSL card handling Joe Arcure W3HNK is in this
neighborhood, I gotta look him up.

Joe used to be a regular at the DX hospitality suites at Dayton. I
haven't seen him in a number of years.

He recently retired from Sun Oil and has tapered back from his former
volume of QSL work. I haven't done an eyball with him for probably 40
years. It's time to dig him up for a lunch.

All of this nostalgia has me fired up to grab my collection of the West
Coast DX Bulletin to re-read some of Cass's gems.

I subscribed to one or another of the dx bulletins but I forget which
one it was. I don't remember a "Cass". I had a big asset in the dx
spots game, I was geographically right in the middle of the FRC 2m
"spots network". I left the rcvr on 24/7, when I heard it light up I
knew there was a goodie lurking somewhere, got into the shack pronto,
fired up and joined the throng on the freq. Some of the poor dx
stations we jumped all over probably wondered what hit 'em.

Then there was the Ham Trader yellow sheets . . I moved a *lotta* gear
in and out with those.


Dave K8MN

w3rv

In article , Alun
writes:

73 de Alun, N3KIP

w3rv

Anyone would try to think you were trying to get rid of me, LOL!

Independent thought must be abolished from this group.

It makes the regular natives restless and they might take up
their spears and fight against Abrams tanks...

LHA / WMD

In article ,
(Brian Kelly) writes:

I wonder if there are any Allied employees left from the days when
they were in the ham biz.

Allied Radio is still an electronics parts distributor, was never solely
in the "ham biz." Allied is now a division of Hamilton-Avnet and
MUCH bigger than it was when they had a single building in Chicago.
I'd been there...impressive showroom to a 15 year old, but not that
great in 1956 when I was 23.

Newark Electronics is still in the electronics parts distributor biz,
also bigger than it was in the 1950s.

There's lots more places to get parts for hum radios now, but the
old-style parts of a half century are very, very scarce. :-)

You really ought to get out more...

LHA / WMD

"William" wrote in message
om...
(Steve Robeson, K4CAP) wrote in message
. com...
(William) wrote in message
. com...

No, we're all hams. Save for one who has an interest in ham radio.

Hey Brain...y'aint talking about Lennie, are you?

Just last week he adamantly stated he had NO interest in Amateur
Radio beyond antagonizing this NG over the Code issue, which he
himself can't seem to stay focused on...

Steve, K4YZ

That is an interest.

Actually he likes to antagonize over anything he can manage to twist into an
argument.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE

In article , "Dee D. Flint"
writes:

That is an interest.

Actually he likes to antagonize over anything he can manage to twist into an
argument.

Only to counter the revisionist history of radio as presented by the
ARRL. :-)

Please, continue to hide head in the sand and let the league be your
Big Brother. They know what is best for ham radio because they say
they do.

Hmmm...we are 20 years past "1984." :-)

LHA / WMD

On Wed, 11 Feb 2004 21:32:23 +0100, "Helmut"
wrote:

sniph

This is not Dave whoever, its HELMUT here!

Anyway, greetings from Europe

They most certainly are from Europe - if you have a look at the
message headers, Helmut is posting from the ISP t-online.de, which is
located in beautiful Germany.

Vilkommen, Helmut. Angenehm!


73 de OE8SOQ

73, Leo

In article ,
(William) writes:

(Len Over 21) wrote in message
...
In article , "Dee D.
Flint"
writes:

That is an interest.

Actually he likes to antagonize over anything he can manage to twist into
an
argument.

Only to counter the revisionist history of radio as presented by the
ARRL. :-)

And ARRL historians and supporters. For example, did you know that a
Morse Code exam now acts as a disincentive to CW use on HF? But only
now. It wasn't always so.

Amazing, isn't it? :-)

I know, I know. We've had that very same disincentive since 1912, and
they fought their hardened little hearts out to preserve it. And we
fought to remove it - the Morse Code Exam, not their hardened little
hearts. But now somehow its a disincentive to CW use.

Absolutely. If a code-loving extra special of three dozen years says
it's so, IT IS SO! We have Heard The Word! :-)

"We've got a bleeder!"

TAFKA Rev. Jim must be in catharsis.

Might I suggest catatonia?

Northern catatonia, that is... :-)

LHA / WMD

In article ,
(William) writes:

(Len Over 21) wrote in message
...
In article , Alun
writes:

73 de Alun, N3KIP

w3rv

Anyone would try to think you were trying to get rid of me, LOL!

Independent thought must be abolished from this group.

That's precisely why I didn't let Dave, Dick, Bruce, Steve, Larrah,
TAFKA Rev. Jim, the other Steve, and Ed run be off.

It makes the regular natives restless and they might take up
their spears and fight against Abrams tanks...

That's how one of their weaker minds ends up declaring that a Morse
Code Exam is a disincentive to CW use on HF.

Must have been a momentary weakness by the mighty macho
morsemen.

I know, I know, they've finally realized that they're a ragtag bunch
of Neanderthals throwing spears at Abrams tanks...

Or have they?

Not yet. They won't stop or admit they were EVER wrong, not
until the last code key is forcibly removed from the cold, dead
fingers of the last PCTA. Sigh.

LHA / WMD

In article , Alun
writes:

(Len Over 21) wrote in news:20040210194505.25517.00004239
:

In article , Alun
writes:

73 de Alun, N3KIP

w3rv

Anyone would try to think you were trying to get rid of me, LOL!

Independent thought must be abolished from this group.

It makes the regular natives restless and they might take up
their spears and fight against Abrams tanks...

LHA / WMD

Well, the joke's on them anyway. I could move to Canada (lovely country,
but too cold for me) and still plague them on rrap.

Move to southern California and hear about the wrap parties in the
entertainment biz. :-)

[mental picture of Zulus against Bradley Fighting Vehicles...:-) ]

LHA / WMD

Brian Kelly wrote:

Dave Heil wrote in message ...
Brian Kelly wrote:

Dave Heil wrote in message ...
Brian Kelly wrote:

You brought back a lot of hilarious memories of "electronerd
educations" gone awry David. Gawd we had fun . . !

The best I've ever heard was deliverd at the Dayton banquet one year by
Jean Shepherd.

I'd love to read it if his talk has been archived somewhere. I'll bet
that if some Shepherd-type individual went out and compiled tales
about all the goofy stunts and missteps kid hams got into back when in
a book it would sell.

I can only hope that someone recorded that banquet talk. Of course most
of Shepherd's stuff was that entertaining. That voice we hearing
narrating "A Christmas Story" is his.

He and Jack Fulmer W4HAV (later W4YF) opened a Volkswagen dealership way
too soon after the war. People weren't quite ready for the car. The
place was on the Kentucky shore opposite Cincinnati, where Jean was
working at WLW.

Well, in my case it was a one-time Christmas deal--the one BIG present
and that was second-hand from Allied's big, used equipment list. The
receiver I saved for was also from the same list.

I wonder if there are any Allied employees left from the days when
they were in the ham biz.

I think there a few still around. There was no one left working from
the old days at the time I went to work for them in 1980. Everything
was Tandy and run from Fort Worth.

More newspaper
deliveries, an after-school job at the local hobby shop several days
each week and the writing of a sports column for the local newspaper
provided coaxial cable and connectors, a key, antenna wire and the
like.

My first store-bought rcvr was a new Hallicrafters S-40B. Which I
bought from Sears & Roebuck believe it or not. At the time Sears sold
the S-38, the S-40, and a couple higher-end Hallicrafters rcvrs. I
think one of 'em was the SX-71. The S-40 catalog price was $119.95.
But I had an aunt who lived in Chicago and worked for Sears so I was
able to get her employee's 10% discount. A whole twelve bucks. I was
as interested in SWLing as much as I was into becoming a Novice so I
spent more time chasing SW BC "rare ones" than I did tuning the W1AW
code practice sessions. Eventually though, maybe a year after I got
the rcvr I had 7.5 wpm down cold and was close to 10 wpm so I trundled
off downtown, took the test and put the S-40 to the real task.

A nice bit of nostalgia! Most of the catalog houses had at least some
ham gear. It is interesting to note that famed industrial designer
Raymond Loewy designed the S-40 cabinetry. He is the fellow who brought
us the '47 Studebaker Starlight Coupe and '53 Starliner Coupe, the '61
Avanti,
the S-1 steam locomotive (Pennsylvania RR), that sharp-looking fifties
Coca-Cola dispenser that we'd see in diners and drug stores, and all
sorts of products from pencil sharpeners to refrigerators.

I bought an S-40A from W7LR a few years back. The design is still
stunning.

W4JBP willed me his 1937 Hallicrafters Sky Challenger years back. He
bought it new from Steinberg's appliance store on Vine Street in
Cincinnati. Steinberg's sold ham gear through the end of 1968

Some of that money was also spent on a big U.S. call area map and
some (sorry, no choice of color) QSL cards from WRL.

Now yer really rubbing it in . . . The Globe King, the King of the
Hill . . ! I understand that Leo is now 93 and is still at it at.

K8CFT, who administered my Novice exam, had a Globe King 500-C in his
shack. I've always wanted one but they are bloody expensive these days.

All of this nostalgia has me fired up to grab my collection of the West
Coast DX Bulletin to re-read some of Cass's gems.

I subscribed to one or another of the dx bulletins but I forget which
one it was. I don't remember a "Cass". I had a big asset in the dx
spots game, I was geographically right in the middle of the FRC 2m
"spots network". I left the rcvr on 24/7, when I heard it light up I
knew there was a goodie lurking somewhere, got into the shack pronto,
fired up and joined the throng on the freq. Some of the poor dx
stations we jumped all over probably wondered what hit 'em.

Cass is Hugh Cassidy WA6AUD. His "West Coast DX Bulletin" was tops.
Cass had a flair for writing and brought us the Old Timer living on top
of the hill; the local QRPer, full of questions (often rhetorical) for
the Old Timer; Red-Eyed Louie, always doing the dawn patrol looking for
rare DX and the Palos Verdes Sundancers. There are numerous other
characters. When Cass retired, his mailing list went to the fellows at
Madison Electronics in Texas. Bill Kennamer K5FUV edited their "QRZ DX"
for a number of years before going to the DXCC desk in Newington to
replace Don Search.

Then there was the Ham Trader yellow sheets . . I moved a *lotta* gear
in and out with those.

I subscribed to the "Yellow Sheets" as well and had Alton's "Ham
Equipment Buyer's Guide" volumes too.

Dave K8MN

Len Over 21 wrote:

In article ,
(Brian Kelly) writes:

I wonder if there are any Allied employees left from the days when
they were in the ham biz.

Allied Radio is still an electronics parts distributor, was never solely
in the "ham biz."

Who said it was?


Allied is now a division of Hamilton-Avnet and
MUCH bigger than it was when they had a single building in Chicago.

They've been bigger since about 1970 when Tandy bought 'em. Allied had
quite a chain of strip mall and downtown stores across the country.
That's precisely why Tandy bought them. Almost all of them became Radio
Shack stores.

I'd been there...impressive showroom to a 15 year old, but not that
great in 1956 when I was 23.

It takes a lot to impress a suave man-of-the-world such as you.

Newark Electronics is still in the electronics parts distributor biz,
also bigger than it was in the 1950s.

Pittsburgh's Cameradio is still in business as CAM/RPC after merging
with Cleveland's Radio Parts Company (the RPC). Hughes-Peters is still
in business though the company has been sold. None of them were ever
solely in the amateur radio business. Hughes-Peters Cincinnati Division
had nine hams on staff and always advertised in the GCARA's "Mike and
Key". Many of our customers had radio amateurs employed. The company
had a busy parts counter and figured that dollars from hams were as good
as dollars from anyone else.

There's lots more places to get parts for hum radios now, but the
old-style parts of a half century are very, very scarce. :-)

No, Leonard, they aren't. There are simply fewer places selling them.
With the stock I have out in the barn, I might run out in another fifty
or so years.

You really ought to get out more...

....sez our resident expert in all things electronic.

Dave K8MN

In article , Dave Heil
writes:

It is interesting to note that famed industrial designer
Raymond Loewy designed the S-40 cabinetry. He is the fellow who brought
us

(brought us the styling, that is)

of

the '47 Studebaker Starlight Coupe and '53 Starliner Coupe, the '61
Avanti, the S-1 steam locomotive (Pennsylvania RR),

The GG-1 electric locomotive (also PRR),

that sharp-looking fifties
Coca-Cola dispenser that we'd see in diners and drug stores, and all
sorts of products from pencil sharpeners to refrigerators.

Loewy (and others) also made it clear that purely functional objects could look
really cool, too, without significant cost increases. In fact, his style
changes to
the GG-1 (including the use of a welded rather than riveted body and the use of

smoother lines) resulted in *reduced* cost.

Unfortunately he was not available to help style the Southgate Type 7.

73 de Jim, N2EY

73 de Jim, N2EY