About Us

April 5th 04, 05:48 PM

(Len Over 21) wrote in message ...
In article , PAMNO
(N2EY) writes:

So what should folks like you and I do about it?

In particular, when someone posts information that is flat out wrong, should
we
simply ignore it or challenge it?

Your first step is to PROVE your "information" is the "truth" that
cannot ever be "flat out wrong."

Why? You don't do that, Len. Why should others have to meet a standard
that you don't meet yourself?

You must separate your OPINION from so-called irrefutable
"truth."

Why? You don't do that, Len. Why should others have to meet a standard
that you don't meet yourself?

Opinion is opinion, not some universal truth just because
you think it is so.

That's true. Which is why it's important to clearly state when
something is an opinion and when it's a provable or disprovable fact.

After you've done all that, you have to consider that some folks
will still be against you. That is the nature of the computer-modem
beast. That will not change, not even if you think you speak the
most truthful words possible by mortals. Get used to it.

Once adjusted to all those very real environmental conditions, but
you still feel that your god-like words are irrefutable truisms, it is
time to pack it in, quit the newsgroup, and perhaps establish
yourself as a swami of a cult somewhere. That's much better
than to hang in and constantly complaining that some just don't
believe your truths to be self-evident and are so irreverent to
your magnificent words. :-)

You should re-read those statements and act on them, Len.

So here's a challenge for you, Len:

Let's see you set the example of "civil debate". That means no
name-calling, no little digs at other people's jobs, names, license
classes, ethnicities or religions, no making fun of their favorite
modes. It also means clear distinctions between facts and opinions.

And it means behaving that way even if someone disagrees with you, or
disproves some claim you make here.

Go ahead, Len. Show us how it's done. I'll follow if you lead. If you
choose to behave the way you typically have done here for the past 7
years or so, I'll just ignore you.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Extra class - question about the test	J999w	General	8	April 13th 04 09:57 PM
From the Extra question pool: The dipole	David Robbins	General	1	January 23rd 04 05:32 PM
From the Extra question pool: The dipole	David Robbins	Policy	0	January 23rd 04 05:16 PM
Low reenlistment rate	charlesb	Policy	54	September 18th 03 01:57 PM
1x2 Calls--automatic when upgrading to Extra?	Jim Hampton	Policy	6	July 15th 03 10:55 PM

Menu

About Us