(Len Over 21) wrote in message ...
In article , "Dee D. Flint"
writes:

"Maximus" wrote in message
link.net...
It may work, but I question how well. One reason for granting permission is
to extend internet to rural areas that can't be served by conventinal means.

Serving the rural areas happens to be the biggest marketing lie in the whole
mess. It won't be econmically feasible in the rural areas. There simply
are not enough customers per square mile to justify the amount of equipment
(e.g. signal boosters and transformer bypasses) that will have to be
installed.

You "know" all those technical things from experience and learning
how to twiddle a morse key in amateur radio?

Morse Code has WHAT to do with rural economics, Your Putziness?
Dee made no such analogy.

The points Dee made are the VERY SAME ones that sway countless
other economic decisions in rural areas, including phone/DSL
distribution, public utilities, and even the placement of hospitals,
police and fire fighting assets.

Unless YOU can prove diffrently?

Please point to a trade-technical press with detailed technical
information on any of the proposed BPL systems. Detailed
descriptions including signal levels, not computer simulations
based on assumptions.

What assumptions have to be made, Your Scumminess? Distribution
and relay support for BPL signals WILL have to be made. Again...YOU
can prove differently? BPL can be distributed from ONE source WITHOUT
adequate relay facilities to ensure network patency?

Have at it, Mr Professional...YOU show us how BPL can be deployed
WITHOUT distribution and relay facilities...

We're waiting...

Steve, K4YZ

Wassa matter, Your Scumminess...?!?!

Not able to answer the question? Too difficult for you? Or are
you UNWILLING to answer the question becasue you already know that the
HONEST answer would unravell yet another LennieRant?

YOU are the ALLEGED electrical engineering "professional"...So
where's the answers?

Don't sweat it...The answer is in your silence.

Thanks.

Steve, K4YZ


(Steve Robeson, K4CAP) wrote in message . com...
(Len Over 21) wrote in message ...
In article , "Dee D. Flint"
writes:

"Maximus" wrote in message
link.net...
It may work, but I question how well. One reason for granting permission is
to extend internet to rural areas that can't be served by conventinal means.

Serving the rural areas happens to be the biggest marketing lie in the whole
mess. It won't be econmically feasible in the rural areas. There simply
are not enough customers per square mile to justify the amount of equipment
(e.g. signal boosters and transformer bypasses) that will have to be
installed.

You "know" all those technical things from experience and learning
how to twiddle a morse key in amateur radio?

Morse Code has WHAT to do with rural economics, Your Putziness?
Dee made no such analogy.

The points Dee made are the VERY SAME ones that sway countless
other economic decisions in rural areas, including phone/DSL
distribution, public utilities, and even the placement of hospitals,
police and fire fighting assets.

Unless YOU can prove diffrently?

Please point to a trade-technical press with detailed technical
information on any of the proposed BPL systems. Detailed
descriptions including signal levels, not computer simulations
based on assumptions.

What assumptions have to be made, Your Scumminess? Distribution
and relay support for BPL signals WILL have to be made. Again...YOU
can prove differently? BPL can be distributed from ONE source WITHOUT
adequate relay facilities to ensure network patency?

Have at it, Mr Professional...YOU show us how BPL can be deployed
WITHOUT distribution and relay facilities...

We're waiting...

Steve, K4YZ