Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Alun wrote in message . ..
Remind me Jim, what do FISTS propose? You can read the entire FISTS proposal at: http://www.fists.org/FIST_FCC_Petition_8-30-303.pdf It can be summed up in six major points: 1) Techs get Tech Plus HF privileges without a code test (which effectively merges the two license classes) 2) Techs allowed all digital modes on HF. 3) Extra code test made 12 wpm 4) No retesting at the same VE session 5) Improved written exams (see petition for details) 6) All the rest of the existing rules stay as-is (no free upgrades, Tech remains entry-level exam, etc.) The FAR/RAF proposal was obviously written in response to the ARRL one, and the two of them are much more alike than they are to the FISTS proposal. Given that they are an organisation for the promotion of CW, I have trouble beleiving that they would suggest anything that is actually responsive to the removal of the international CW test requirement, but I could be wrong(?). Note that under the FISTS proposal Techs would not have to take a code test to get Novice/Tech Plus HF. Note also that the vast majority of individuals commenting supported this proposal, and that agreement among FISTS members was in excess of 98%. Will FCC enact all of it? Maybe not, but if you don't ask you never get. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FISTS petition to the FCC | Policy | |||
NCI Petition available on FCC ECFS | Policy | |||
FCC taking Comments on RM-10787 Morse Code Elimination Petition | Policy | |||
NCI filed Petition for Rulemaking Aug. 13 | Policy | |||
Some comments on the NCVEC petition | Policy |