"Jim Hampton" wrote in message ...
"N2EY" wrote in message
...


Generally agreed by whom?

The BPL developers don't agree. And they're professionals.

The FCC doesn't agree. They're professionals too, and regulators of all
"civilian" radio and wire communications in the USA.

And why just an "urban environment"? What about suburbia? Or rural
locations
which will supposedly be the places where BPL will provide service not
available from other technologies?

How will you or anyone else convince these *professionals* "Access BPL
will be
a bad thing in any urban radio environment" when they have not agreed with
the
calculations and first hand-observations of others?

Sure, a lot of us will file comments. Maybe they'll do some good. But just
because you were finally convinced of the BPL threat, don;t be surprised
if the
"professionals" don't agree.

Hello, Jim

Hello Jim

Well, let's find out how well BPL works with 100 to 200 watts (don't need a
KW +) into a dipole in an urban environment. It will be *their* problem.
The sword cuts both ways

I hope that's true. Note how vague the NPRM language is about how
interference is to be mitigated.

73 de Jim, N2EY