Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Alun" wrote in message ... Maybe we could come up with a certificate for operating from BPL test sites, with endorsements for 500W, 1kW and 1.5kW? Gentlemen (and other denizens of RRAP :-) Suggestions of deliberate interference to ANYTHING (including BPL, which under the law has no right to protection from licensed services) will NOT make any friends for us at the FCC, on Capital Hill, or in the court of public opinion ... especially when all of those venues are mostly ill-informed on the real nature of the problem ... If these suggestions, even if offered in jest, get into the hands of the BPL spin doctors, they will not hesitate to publicly tar and feather the amateur radio service, at the FCC, to Congresspersons, and as widely as possible in the press (and we know how the press likes a controversial story, don't we?) PLEASE, I implore you - drop these concepts from public venues like usenet! You will do FAR more harm than good. We MUST "take the high road" on the BPL issue ... that doesn't mean rolling over and taking it ... but it does mean not shooting ourselves in the foot with such irresponsible talk. 73, Carl - wk3c |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
NPRM and VEC | General | |||
BPL NPRM Approved | Policy | |||
BPL NPRM | Policy | |||
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse coderequirement. | Policy | |||
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. | Policy |