| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#3
March 23rd 04, 02:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Subject: FCC Assigns RM Numbers To Three New Restructuring Petitions
From: "Dee D. Flint" Date: 3/23/2004 8:20 AM Central Standard Time Message-id: m How many petitions does that make altogether. Don't these people realize that the plethora of petitions will drag out the process? It demonstrates a lack of consensus in the ham community, which could cause the FCC to do exactly nothing. Naaaaaa.....They'll do "something", mostly because it's expected of them, not because it's necessarilly needed or appropriate to do so. The smartest thing they COULD have done was defuse all the controversy in the first place and "suspend" further code testing when S25.5 was modified...especially since that was the way they were already leaning in the first place, public opinon notwithstanding. And the second smartest thing they could have done was meld the Novice and Advanced Class licenses into the three remaining classes. The whole purpose of "Restructuring" was to administratively streamline the FCC's workload...Sooooooooo...Why leave two whole classes of licenses out there with no possibility of making new ones? They should have just taken a one-time swipe at clearing the database then. 73 Steve, K4YZ |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| New ARRL Proposal | Policy | |||
| My restructuring proposal | Policy | |||
| Responses to 14 Petitions on Code Testing | Policy | |||
| Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | General | |||
| What's All Dose Numbers Hams Use | Dx | |||
Threaded Mode
