LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #6   Report Post  
Old March 23rd 04, 04:10 PM
Dee D. Flint
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Steve Robeson K4CAP" wrote in message
...
Subject: FCC Assigns RM Numbers To Three New Restructuring Petitions
From: "Dee D. Flint"
Date: 3/23/2004 8:20 AM Central Standard Time
Message-id: m


How many petitions does that make altogether. Don't these people realize
that the plethora of petitions will drag out the process? It

demonstrates a
lack of consensus in the ham community, which could cause the FCC to do
exactly nothing.


Naaaaaa.....They'll do "something", mostly because it's expected of

them,
not because it's necessarilly needed or appropriate to do so.

The smartest thing they COULD have done was defuse all the

controversy in
the first place and "suspend" further code testing when S25.5 was
modified...especially since that was the way they were already leaning in

the
first place, public opinon notwithstanding.

And the second smartest thing they could have done was meld the

Novice and
Advanced Class licenses into the three remaining classes. The whole

purpose
of "Restructuring" was to administratively streamline the FCC's
workload...Sooooooooo...Why leave two whole classes of licenses out there

with
no possibility of making new ones? They should have just taken a one-time
swipe at clearing the database then.

73

Steve, K4YZ


Keeping the classes has the advantage that they could easily be re-opened if
they should decide that they made a mistake. It's happened in the past.
With today's computerized databases, it just isn't that difficult to keep
the "orphaned" classes. I suspect within the next few years, the Novice
licenses will diminish greatly anyway due to lack of renewal.

The simplest thing would have been to simply decide how many, if any,
classes would keep the code and leave the structure otherwise unchanged.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New ARRL Proposal N2EY Policy 331 March 4th 04 01:02 AM
My restructuring proposal Jason Hsu Policy 0 January 20th 04 07:24 PM
Responses to 14 Petitions on Code Testing Len Over 21 Policy 0 October 23rd 03 12:38 AM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 Radionews General 0 September 20th 03 05:12 PM
What's All Dose Numbers Hams Use A Ham Elmer Dx 3 July 16th 03 05:44 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:05 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017