Dee D. Flint wrote:
"N2EY" wrote in message
...


RM-10867 - ARRL, 18 March 2004

http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/r...f=pdf&id_docum
ent=6516083735




RM-10870 - NCVEC, 3 March 2004

http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/r...f=pdf&id_docum
ent=6516082208



RM-10868 - AG4RQ, 18 March 2004

http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/r...f=pdf&id_docum
ent=6515783299


73 de Jim, N2EY


How many petitions does that make altogether. Don't these people realize
that the plethora of petitions will drag out the process? It demonstrates a
lack of consensus in the ham community, which could cause the FCC to do
exactly nothing.


All things I had taken into account in my prediction! I remember how
incredulous some were at my idea of how long it would take. My "4 years
to change" may have even been optimistic!

And yes, there is a decided lack of consensus in the Amateur community,
especially when a sizable percentage of us (perhaps even a majority)
prefer that Morse testing be kept, in direct opposition to the way
things are likely to go!

- Mike KB3EIA -