| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Dee D. Flint" wrote in message y.com... Keeping the "orpahned" classes has the advantage that they could easily be re-opened if they should decide that they made a mistake. Three classes is plenty and I doubt there's any regrets at reducing the number of licenses. It remains now as to what the best three are to be as per the RRL and NCVEC which are pretty much unified as to eliminating Tech and Advanced. Does any other country also have three classes? With today's computerized databases, it just isn't that difficult to keep the "orphaned" classes. It isn't just record keeping...it is also about keeping the rules and regs that are unique to those two classes on the books and subject to enforcement. Of course, another means is to leave Advanced and, rather than a free upgrade, just indicate that the privieges for Advanced are now identical to Extra. I suspect within the next few years, the Novice licenses will diminish greatly anyway due to lack of renewal. There are only about 32K now. The simplest thing would have been to simply decide how many, if any, classes would keep the code and leave the structure otherwise unchanged. That has been done by ARRL (three classes and only Extra would be code tested) and NCVEC (three licenses and NO code test at all). Cheers, Bill K2UNK |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| New ARRL Proposal | Policy | |||
| My restructuring proposal | Policy | |||
| Responses to 14 Petitions on Code Testing | Policy | |||
| Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | General | |||
| What's All Dose Numbers Hams Use | Dx | |||