Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mike Coslo" wrote in message ... Carl R. Stevenson wrote: The power limits make sense. Do you support not teaching newcomers about RF safety? I believe they should be, and as long as they know the fundamentals, they should have the same power privileges as the rest of us. I'll say right out that not teaching new people the fundamentals of RF and electrical safety is not very responsible. The power limit is about RF exposure and the need to do the evaluations. This is something that I think can reasonably be considered beyond the "beginner" level, as it requires a foundation in a number of areas. We can't expect the newcomer to learn EVERYTHING before then can get on the air ... compare the Novice tests of years past with their small number of questions and study guides with a dozen or less pages to "Now You're Talking," which contains 200-some pages and it's clear that "the bar" for entry has increased greatly from the entry level tests that I and many others took those many years ago ... the proposal is not a "dumbing down" for the entry level ... it's an attempt to rationalize beginner level tests and beginner level privileges, while providing an incentive (gee, I hate to use that word, since the incentive used to be keyed to Morse proficiency more than anything else) to learn and advance. [snipped the rest where we seem to be in fundamental agreement] 73, Carl - wk3c |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
New ARRL Proposal | Policy | |||
My restructuring proposal | Policy | |||
Responses to 14 Petitions on Code Testing | Policy | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | General | |||
What's All Dose Numbers Hams Use | Dx |