Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Phil Kane" wrote in message et... On Sun, 28 Mar 2004 14:26:48 GMT, Bill Sohl wrote: What for...by your own statements you admit nothing was done by the FCC? The fact that one or more FCC attorneys may have wanted action taken doesn't validate anything other than those FCC folks that wanted action couldn't convince their management that the case either had merit or was worth the time and expense. .. All the academic discussion of what may have been the legal outcome had Bash been challenged means nothing in the end. Not being prosecuted or otherwise punished for an act doesn't mean that the act didn't take place. True, and it is equally valid that... Not being prosecuted for an act doesn't mean that the individual would have been found guilty of the act had he actually been prosecuted. Cheers, Bill K2UNK |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
New ARRL Proposal | Policy | |||
My restructuring proposal | Policy | |||
Responses to 14 Petitions on Code Testing | Policy | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | General | |||
What's All Dose Numbers Hams Use | Dx |