| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#1
March 31st 04, 04:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Where's The Specification, Brain?
Subject: Wrong Yet Again, Len!
From: (William) Date: 3/31/2004 7:42 AM Central Standard Time Message-id: "Dee D. Flint" wrote in message ... Those who understand how Morse Code works have no problem with the use of Farnsworth spacing. Naturally. Farnsworth spaced code for slow word speeds is much easier to copy than using slow letters. Unnaturally. If the person prepared for Morse Code as stated in the regulation, the Farnsworth Code will zip by. Failure is predictable. Brain, WHERE in ANY FCC regulation is a "technical standard" for Morse Code expressed? Now...HERE WE GO AGAIN: You, Brian "billybeeper" Burke, have made an assertion that a person may be "prepared for Morse Code as stated in the regulation..." I am ASKING YOU, WHERE in PART 97 or ANY FCC regulation, does a 'specification' or 'technical standard' for the spacing of Morse Code characters exist? Inquiring minds....... Steve, K4YZ |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| WiMAX 802.16a specification | Antenna | |||
| Maybe THIS Time, Brain...?!?! | Policy | |||
| Specification for Antena tuners-radio interfaces | Digital | |||
| Specification for Antena tuners-radio interfaces | Digital | |||
| Why Can't Brain Just Say "Yes" Or "No"...?!?! | Policy | |||
Threaded Mode
