Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jason Hsu" wrote in message om... | Until the ARRL proposal came out, I had never heard anyone propose | automatic upgrades of Technician licensees to the General class. Now | that this proposal has come out, many people are defending this part | of the proposal. People support the ARRL proposal because it gives about 65% of all existing hams a coupon for a free pass to General or Extra. That suggests that the proposal would gain 65% support right out of the box. Even NCI has decided to support it, but then the vast majority of NCI members are techs who would be eligible for the freebie. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"KØHB" wrote in message link.net...
People support the ARRL proposal because it gives about 65% of all existing hams a coupon for a free pass to General or Extra. That suggests that the proposal would gain 65% support right out of the box. Even NCI has decided to support it, but then the vast majority of NCI members are techs who would be eligible for the freebie. Where did you read that No-Code International supports the ARRL proposal? NCI already submitted a petition, and this petition only advocated the elimination of the Morse Code test requirement. NCI's mission is to eliminate this requirement all around the world. It would not be appropriate for NCI to advocate automatically upgrading Technicians to General. Jason Hsu, AG4DG |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jason Hsu" wrote in message
om... It would not be appropriate for NCI to advocate automatically upgrading Technicians to General. Jason Hsu, AG4DG It could be construed as a "natural progression." After all, when you get right down to it, it's actually about a reduction of effort...the degree of which is subjective. 73 de Bert WA2SI |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jason Hsu" wrote | Where did you read that No-Code International supports the ARRL | proposal? NCI already submitted a petition, and this petition only | advocated the elimination of the Morse Code test requirement. NCI's | mission is to eliminate this requirement all around the world. It | would not be appropriate for NCI to advocate automatically upgrading | Technicians to General. Here is an excerpt from a message sent to NCI members: "Almost two months ago we asked for your input on the major aspects of the ARRL petition (RM-10867) for amateur license restructuring. You are one of the 800+ members who participated in the survey. We thank you for your valued input! The response was overwhelming as to desiring NCI to support all the points in the ARRL petition, except, of course, any continued code testing." As I read it, that means that NCI is on record as supporting... .... the ARRL proposal for a new Novice license. .... the ARRL proposal to immediately upgrade all Technicians to General .... the ARRL proposal to immediately upgrade all Advanceds to Extra .... the ARRL proposal to end code testing for General .... the ARRL proposal for re-farming of the old Novice bands. In other words, "Let the Great Giveaway Begin". 73, de Hans, K0HB |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
KØHB wrote:
"Jason Hsu" wrote | Where did you read that No-Code International supports the ARRL | proposal? NCI already submitted a petition, and this petition only | advocated the elimination of the Morse Code test requirement. NCI's | mission is to eliminate this requirement all around the world. It | would not be appropriate for NCI to advocate automatically upgrading | Technicians to General. Here is an excerpt from a message sent to NCI members: "Almost two months ago we asked for your input on the major aspects of the ARRL petition (RM-10867) for amateur license restructuring. You are one of the 800+ members who participated in the survey. We thank you for your valued input! The response was overwhelming as to desiring NCI to support all the points in the ARRL petition, except, of course, any continued code testing." As I read it, that means that NCI is on record as supporting... ... the ARRL proposal for a new Novice license. ... the ARRL proposal to immediately upgrade all Technicians to General ... the ARRL proposal to immediately upgrade all Advanceds to Extra ... the ARRL proposal to end code testing for General ... the ARRL proposal for re-farming of the old Novice bands. In other words, "Let the Great Giveaway Begin". In other words, you can take NCI's previous positions like all they want to do is elimninate the code test, nothing else and chuck that, eh? Who'd a thunk it? Aren't you a member of NCI, Hans? Heheheheheh. only the code test, only the code test, only the code test..................... |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mike Coslo" wrote | | Aren't you a member of NCI, Hans? | | Heheheheheh. | Aren't you a member of ARRL, Mike? (Which first proposed this "Grand Giveaway") Heheheheheh. With all kind wishes, de Hans, K0HB |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
KØHB wrote:
"Mike Coslo" wrote | | Aren't you a member of NCI, Hans? | | Heheheheheh. | Aren't you a member of ARRL, Mike? (Which first proposed this "Grand Giveaway") Heheheheheh. Yes, I am a member of ARRL. But last time I checked, if you don't toe the party line in NCI, you aren't allowed in NCI. And that my friend, is no laughing matter. ARRL appears to tolerate disagreement. - mike KB3EIA - |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mike Coslo" wrote | | But last time I checked, if you don't toe | the party line in NCI, you aren't allowed in NCI. | | And that my friend, is no laughing matter. | Sunuvagun, you seem to be wrong again. I have VIOLENTLY disagreed with NCI on the notion of free Tech-to-General upgrades, both here in public and in private email with the directors. Since they haven't excommunicated me, I guess that the laugh is on you, my friend. Heheheheheh! (Or is it BWAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!) With all kind wishes, de Hans, K0HB |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Why the ARRL proposed upgrading Technicians to General | Policy | |||
Upgrading to from Tech Plus to General, help on a FCC Form 605 question please | General | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part Two (Communicator License) | Policy | |||
Amateur Radio in the 21st Century? | Policy | |||
Tech+ to General upgrade question | Policy |