KØHB wrote:
"Mike Coslo" wrote

|
| But last time I checked, if you don't toe
| the party line in NCI, you aren't allowed in NCI.
|
| And that my friend, is no laughing matter.
|

Sunuvagun, you seem to be wrong again. I have VIOLENTLY disagreed with
NCI on the notion of free Tech-to-General upgrades, both here in public
and in private email with the directors. Since they haven't
excommunicated me, I guess that the laugh is on you, my friend.

Heheheheheh! (Or is it BWAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!)


So it has ALWAYS been a policy that NCI has supported reductions in the
written elements? We've been told otherwise in here and elsewhere. Or is
this something new, and they are broadening their horizons?


And *you* might be skirting article 4 part 2, perhaps?


Massive credibility problem here. Laugh as necessary!

- Mike KB3EIA -

"Mike Coslo" wrote


|
| Massive credibility problem here. Laugh as necessary!
|

BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!! SNICKER!!!!! CHORTLE!!!!!!!!
HEHEHEHEHEHEHEH!!!!!

KØHB wrote:

"Mike Coslo" wrote


|
| Massive credibility problem here. Laugh as necessary!
|

BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!! SNICKER!!!!! CHORTLE!!!!!!!!
HEHEHEHEHEHEHEH!!!!!

See, now don't you feel better?


- Mike KB3EIA -