LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #13   Report Post  
Old April 27th 04, 04:22 AM
Steve Robeson K4CAP
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Subject: Cell phone woes
From: (William)
Date: 4/26/2004 5:24 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:


No, Steve. There YOU go again.


Brian, why do you want to start lying again?

It's been a nice couple of weeks, and here you are again, trying to hide
behind middle school boys and re-write what others have said despite the
inviobility of Google.

Brian, I have ALWAYS stated that there are SOME "non-Amateur"

personnel
involved in MARS.


You absolutely have NOT.


"Absolutely", Brian?

I have REPEATEDLY said there are non-Amateur Active Duty personnel
assigned to the MARS program.

This is what you stated: " Sorry Hans, MARS IS "Amateur Radio".
"

Must I define " IS " for you?

Not only aren't all MARS personnel not amateur radio operators, but
MARS is NOT Amateur Radio.

Most of those are Active Duty Armed Forces.


And so you start modifying your position.


I see...Once someone says "something", it is absolute and non-amendable.

You ARE an idiot, Burke.

At first, " Sorry Hans, MARS IS "Amateur Radio". "

Then, you allowed for active duty personnel.


I have said that long before this, Brian. Please get your stories
straight.

You provided
the name of ONE person who is neither Amateur nor ADAF.


It only takes ONE to make your equation false.


What equation?

That over 90% of the membership of MARS are licensed Amateurs?

That at any given moment the program is WHOLLY depenedent on those
AMATEURS...?

You can beleive that if you want to, but it will make you look pretty
idiotic, Brian

I will accept that
there are probably folks who fall into that same category for N/MC and Army
MARS.


It matters not that you accept it. As a matter of fact, the more you
modify your nonsense statement that " Sorry Hans, MARS IS
"Amateur Radio". ," the closer you come to the truth.

I still contend that the numbers will be around 1%, certainly no more
than 10%.


Yet another modification. Congrats.

That means 90% of the load is carried by licensed Amateur Radio

operators.

If you say so. I'm losing interest.


No doubt you are. You are woefully unprepared and wholly incapable of
carrying on an adequate debate here, Brian. You border on incompetent.

Let me know when you accept that your statement was false.


MARS - Amateur Radio = Ancient History.

MARS IS Amateur Radio. Sorry you don't agree. Sorry you don't
UNDERSTAND.

Now scurry off with the Scouts, Brian. I am sure your "knowledge" and
"experiences" impress them.

Steve, K4YZ






 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cell phone regulation on airlines? C J Campbell General 28 October 14th 04 04:09 PM
Cell Phone Hardline Theplanters95 Antenna 6 September 4th 04 01:38 PM
On cell phone jamming an other intentional interference... Toscano General 2 July 17th 03 07:10 PM
insides of a cell phone? larry Equipment 2 July 6th 03 04:45 PM
insides of a cell phone? larry Equipment 0 July 5th 03 12:26 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:54 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017