Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 "N2EY" == N2EY writes: [...] N2EY Perhaps someone can explain a certain operating habit I hear on N2EY Field Day - but only one 'phone: N2EY I hear most FD 'phone ops repeating the *received* N2EY exchange. That is, you'll hear: N2EY "November Two Echo Yankee from November Three Kilo Zed, roger N2EY your One Bravo Eastern Pennsylvania, OK on your 1B EPA, please N2EY copy my three alfa ...." N2EY Why do so many deem it necessary to tell me what I just told N2EY them? Heck, I know what class and section I'm in! Actually, we were told to do it at our site. The purpose of the repeat is to ensure that information was transferred correctly. This is relevant in real emergency communications as well as contesting, in my eyes, and I think it's good practice. N2EY On CW, the single letter "R" does the job, and some ops don't N2EY even bother with the R - they send their exchange as an N2EY indication that they got yours. Or they send "TU" - (thank you) N2EY which does the job of "roger" and "73" both. Hopefully my code will be fast enough that I can observe the CW station during FD this year. Jack. - -- Jack Twilley jmt at twilley dot org http colon slash slash www dot twilley dot org slash tilde jmt slash -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAk+KMGPFSfAB/ezgRApkLAJ4seayv7lnDFtcNZ+YMl8CR1HpdcQCePWV6 TYJetaGTT1OAJuAdV57phSQ= =Ugj+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FCC Assigns RM Numbers To Three New Restructuring Petitions | Policy | |||
Rev.Jim the troller (was Bootlegging in 1948?) | Policy | |||
With CW gone, can the CW allocations be far behind? | Policy | |||
Ham Radio In The Post-Code Testing Era | Policy | |||
With CW gone, can the CW allocations be far behind? | General |