| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Alun" wrote in message ... "Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote in nk.net: "N2EY" wrote in message m... Perhaps someone can explain a certain operating habit I hear on Field Day - but only one 'phone: I hear most FD 'phone ops repeating the *received* exchange. That is, you'll hear: "November Two Echo Yankee from November Three Kilo Zed, roger your One Bravo Eastern Pennsylvania, OK on your 1B EPA, please copy my three alfa ...." Why do so many deem it necessary to tell me what I just told them? Heck, I know what class and section I'm in! On CW, the single letter "R" does the job, and some ops don't even bother with the R - they send their exchange as an indication that they got yours. Or they send "TU" - (thank you) which does the job of "roger" and "73" both. -- One other point: Neither FD nor SS have the signal report as part of the contact. FD is callsign, section and class, SS is serial number, class, callsign, check and section, plus date and time which you don't have to send but which are part of the required logging. 73 de Jim, N2EY Well Jim, I think it means that phone ops are lids and real hams do it with continous wave. Dan/W4NTI At last your real agenda comes out, Dan. Somehow. I'm not surprised. You want the code test kept because you consider all of us phone ops to be lids. Alun, N3KIP No, not all phone ops are lids. Just the ones that think phone is better than CW. Does that shoe fit Alun? Dan/W4NTI |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| FCC Assigns RM Numbers To Three New Restructuring Petitions | Policy | |||
| Rev.Jim the troller (was Bootlegging in 1948?) | Policy | |||
| With CW gone, can the CW allocations be far behind? | Policy | |||
| Ham Radio In The Post-Code Testing Era | Policy | |||
| With CW gone, can the CW allocations be far behind? | General | |||