Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Alun
writes: Don't forget, the requirements for DXCC are far more stringent than those of mere legality. I have seen threads before where people have argued past oneanother on this point, i.e. one of them has used the term 'legal' when they were really talking about DXCC eligibility, a big mistake. For example, operation without the permission of the owner of the land or building is not valid for DXCC, but it is seldom illegal. More to the point in this case, perhaps(?), operation from a war zone is legal with permission of whoever appears to be in control, but good luck getting it approved for DXCC. Alun, if there be some etymology of that thread, no "DXCC" was involved. No contesting at all was involved. It began when Heil made some chance remark about "working Frenchmen on 6m out of band." Brian Burke tossed that one back to him with some mild ascerbicity which caused Heil to go bananas. Nursie got out his rusty bayonet, locked and loaded, and made like the Charge of Lite Brigade (which led into the Valley of Death of his of today). Nursie never got to Somalia, certainly not to any "hostile action" there (or anyplace else with any proof) but Brian Burke did. Brian earlier had made a chance remark about operating from there on ham frequencies, getting permission from his commanding officer. That resulted in a long, overdrawn word battle and flame war with Heil who was resentful (to the max) of anyone having the temerity to toss him a rejoinder. Nursie jumped in on that with usual diss-and-cuss, trying to make like a legal eagle with smarts instead of the hummingbird with dumbth. The PCTA of this newsgrope all seem to be self-righteous, prissy puritans of perfection who will explode with outrage at the slightest provocation of their beloved manual telegraphy as being anything less than the ultimate skill of amateurs. It's almost as Henry Ford put it on the color of the Model T: "You can have any opinion you want, so long as its pro- code." That's the "new" freedom of speech in here. Enjoy. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
(William) writes: (Len Over 21) wrote in message ... In article , Alun writes: Don't forget, the requirements for DXCC are far more stringent than those of mere legality. I have seen threads before where people have argued past oneanother on this point, i.e. one of them has used the term 'legal' when they were really talking about DXCC eligibility, a big mistake. For example, operation without the permission of the owner of the land or building is not valid for DXCC, but it is seldom illegal. More to the point in this case, perhaps(?), operation from a war zone is legal with permission of whoever appears to be in control, but good luck getting it approved for DXCC. Alun, if there be some etymology of that thread, no "DXCC" was involved. No contesting at all was involved. It began when Heil made some chance remark about "working Frenchmen on 6m out of band." Brian Burke tossed that one back to him with some mild ascerbicity which caused Heil to go bananas. Nursie got out his rusty bayonet, locked and loaded, and made like the Charge of Lite Brigade (which led into the Valley of Death of his of today). Nursie never got to Somalia, certainly not to any "hostile action" there (or anyplace else with any proof) but Brian Burke did. Brian earlier had made a chance remark about operating from there on ham frequencies, getting permission from his commanding officer. That resulted in a long, overdrawn word battle and flame war with Heil who was resentful (to the max) of anyone having the temerity to toss him a rejoinder. Nursie jumped in on that with usual diss-and-cuss, trying to make like a legal eagle with smarts instead of the hummingbird with dumbth. The PCTA of this newsgrope all seem to be self-righteous, prissy puritans of perfection who will explode with outrage at the slightest provocation of their beloved manual telegraphy as being anything less than the ultimate skill of amateurs. It's almost as Henry Ford put it on the color of the Model T: "You can have any opinion you want, so long as its pro- code." That's the "new" freedom of speech in here. Enjoy. I got back from a week of aerial operations, drove by the storage unit, and checked that the lock wasn't jimmied ("jimmied" is a common use for B/E, not a slam against the Rev. Jim). My T5 logs are safe and secure. One day they may have real historical value. I could divide them up and run some through Christie's and the others through Sothby's. Maybe I'll just make a run of numbered copies, suitable for framing. A press run would be a non-good idea. That would start another spate of Book Burning by the PCTA in general, sponsored by the enemies of fantasy. Some overweight stubbly-faced documentary film maker would get publicity for his expose of Somalia, that it "never happened." ["Moore to come" as Variety put it...] Denial of reality is the stock in trade of the olde-tyme hammes who love, honor, and obey morsemanship. Everyone who speaks against them "LIE!" :-) LHA / WMD |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
(Len Over 21) wrote in message ...
In article , (William) writes: I got back from a week of aerial operations, drove by the storage unit, and checked that the lock wasn't jimmied ("jimmied" is a common use for B/E, not a slam against the Rev. Jim). My T5 logs are safe and secure. One day they may have real historical value. I could divide them up and run some through Christie's and the others through Sothby's. Maybe I'll just make a run of numbered copies, suitable for framing. A press run would be a non-good idea. That would start another spate of Book Burning by the PCTA in general, sponsored by the enemies of fantasy. Farenheit 911. Some overweight stubbly-faced documentary film maker would get publicity for his expose of Somalia, that it "never happened." ["Moore to come" as Variety put it...] He's gotta shave that stubble before squeezing into that CAP flight suit. Denial of reality is the stock in trade of the olde-tyme hammes who love, honor, and obey morsemanship. Everyone who speaks against them "LIE!" :-) Battle Cry: "Liar, Liar, Pants on Fire!" |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Subject: Temper Fry, Was Able Baker Charlie
From: (William) Date: 6/22/2004 5:39 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: My T5 logs are safe and secure. One day they may have real historical value. I could divide them up and run some through Christie's and the others through Sothby's. Maybe I'll just make a run of numbered copies, suitable for framing. Suitable only if they ever create a museum for falsified documents. Steve, K4YZ |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
(William) writes: (Len Over 21) wrote in message ... In article , (William) writes: I got back from a week of aerial operations, drove by the storage unit, and checked that the lock wasn't jimmied ("jimmied" is a common use for B/E, not a slam against the Rev. Jim). My T5 logs are safe and secure. One day they may have real historical value. I could divide them up and run some through Christie's and the others through Sothby's. Maybe I'll just make a run of numbered copies, suitable for framing. A press run would be a non-good idea. That would start another spate of Book Burning by the PCTA in general, sponsored by the enemies of fantasy. Farenheit 911. Ray Bradbury might sue nursie, too. :-) Some overweight stubbly-faced documentary film maker would get publicity for his expose of Somalia, that it "never happened." ["Moore to come" as Variety put it...] He's gotta shave that stubble before squeezing into that CAP flight suit. Michael Moore gonna be a CAP co-pilot?!? :-) Denial of reality is the stock in trade of the olde-tyme hammes who love, honor, and obey morsemanship. Everyone who speaks against them "LIE!" :-) Battle Cry: "Liar, Liar, Pants on Fire!" I think some other idiot already used that old schoolyard taunt in here...as an adult! Probably the Adell-pated one. :-) Unimportant. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|