| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#13
July 3rd 04, 01:09 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Subject: response to UPLC new release/comments on BPL
From: PAMNO (N2EY) Date: 7/3/2004 6:27 AM Central Standard Time Message-id: In article , (Steve Robeson K4CAP) writes: Few will notice or appreciate that disparity you point out, even though it's a very valid one...Just like the folks who ignore the "Part 15" caveat on thier "consumer electroics" devices at home who get "stepped on" by a licensed transmitter ("those !@#$%^ hams"...regardless of what service is the culprit) and then demand the FCC "do something" about "them". That's because they're not educated about how things work. Of course, education costs time and money, and educated customers are harder to please. Mostly money. A one or two page pamphlet of what can be expected couldn't cost more than a few extra cents to include in the device. Of course if the consumer KNEW what they really needed to, they might demand that the things be properly engineered and manufactured in the first place! 73 Steve, K4YZ |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| BPL - UPLC ->Repeat the lie three times and claim it for truth | Policy | |||
| BPL, the ARRL and the UPLC | Homebrew | |||
| UPLC on BPL: ignore armchair amateurs who still use vacuum tubetransmitters | Policy | |||
| BPL - act today to save our HF bands | Antenna | |||
| IMPORTANT! FCC OET extends Reply Comment Period on BPL | Policy | |||
Threaded Mode
