LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #14   Report Post  
Old July 3rd 04, 10:06 PM
Robert Casey
 
Posts: n/a
Default




Of course if the consumer KNEW what they really needed to, they might
demand that the things be properly engineered and manufactured in the first
place!



As Beavis and Butthead are fond of saying: "You can't polish a turd".
There's no way to
make BPL using HF and VHF frequencies not QRM licensed users of those
frequencies.
Even microwave BPL is going to goof someone else up. Except maybe put
them on the
same frequency as that used by all the microwave ovens...

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
BPL - UPLC ->Repeat the lie three times and claim it for truth King Zulu Policy 213 July 16th 04 11:31 PM
BPL, the ARRL and the UPLC John Walton Homebrew 0 July 2nd 04 12:26 PM
UPLC on BPL: ignore armchair amateurs who still use vacuum tubetransmitters JJ Policy 2 June 30th 04 01:41 AM
BPL - act today to save our HF bands Rob Kemp Antenna 9 August 14th 03 12:27 PM
IMPORTANT! FCC OET extends Reply Comment Period on BPL Carl R. Stevenson Policy 21 August 7th 03 09:08 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:32 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017