| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#5
July 12th 04, 07:47 AM
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 10 Jul 2004, Steve Robeson K4CAP wrote:
Subject: WX Receivers and Repeaters retransmitting non-weather alerts. From: "D. Stussy" Date: 7/10/2004 3:18 AM Central Standard Time Message-id: On Fri, 9 Jul 2004, Phil Kane wrote: On Thu, 08 Jul 2004 05:07:37 GMT, D. Stussy wrote: If the content of the warning is to reach the greatest number of people in the shortest period of time, even a "verbatim retransmission" by an amateur station NOT using the NWS audio of information heard from there could be an unjustified delay that costs a life. Comments? Why not petition to change the rules to allow such retransmission? Because I believe that [simultaneous and automatic] retransmission is ALREADY PROVIDED FOR in the existing rules and should not be considered a violation. The "simultaneous and automatic retransmission" you refer to is for AMATEUR communications... The FCC has repeatedly and unwaveringly stated that is it ILLEGAL for Amateurs to rebroadcast non-Amateur traffic. Period. Wrong. Look at the recent modification to .113 for WX stations. Also, retransmission of NASA Shuttle communications has been in the rules for more than a decade (granted, the initial retransmitter is supposed to get permission from NASA, but the fact that it is allowed in ANY FORM defeats your absolute statement). At most, the existing problem is one FCC employee's view - and thus a bad ruling. What is there to actually change? YOUR understanding of the rules, obviously It's not ONE "FCC employee's view". It's been stated and restated ever since I was first licensed (over 30 years now), and there's no likelyhood they'll change thier minds. The FCC knows, as well as almost every other active Amateur, that if you have a 2 meter rig, you can listen to the NOAA weather. So what need is there to rebroadcast the actual audio? Your view is ...? There are NOAA receivers available for less than $20. Non-Amateurs who want to listen to it can do so without having to buy a $200+ Amateur device and modify it in order to do so. The NOAA channels are available options in CB's, FRS and Marine radios already. Receivers less than $20.00 don't have SAME or special actions that they take when hearing an EAS broadcast. You've missed the point here..... The places where NOAA transmissions can NOT be heard are extremely few. I am sure there is some remote butte in Montanna or some valley in West Virginia that has poor or no coverage...But certainly not enough for the FCC to reverese it's policy...Espeically in light of NOAA's expenditures to spread the net. In my "neighborhood" alone I can hear transmissions on 3 of the seven channels on an HT...I can imagine what I might hear with a dedicated receiver and appropriate antenna. Those Amateurs who want to hear it are usually already involved in SKYWARN and already know the frequencies to tune to. They don't have to cling to a local repeater hoping that someone else will "rebroadcast" NOAA audio. Then explain why the rules were changed a couple of years ago to permit it.... Lastly, for someone who keeps whining about another Amateur posting Amateur Radio related news items in an Amateur Radio forum, I find it really funny that you want to play junior disc jockey on Amateur Radio with NON Amateur weather broadcasts. This topic is clearly about the rules and FCC policy (and its interpretation fo the rules). There are many things in AR Newsline that have nothing to do with the rules or operating practice and therefore don't belong here on ".policy" (but may be appropriate to one of the other amateur radio newsgroups). |
Threaded Mode
