Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dee D. Flint wrote:
"N2EY" wrote in message ... In article , Robert Casey writes: Hams - old and new - didn't change the exam procedures. Neither did ARRL, NCI, NCVEC or any other ham group. FCC did, because it saved them resources. We aren't going to a system other than multiple-choice published-Q&A-pool exams in the foreseeable future. Just not gonna happen. ANd then there's the question of what knowledge should be expected from applicants anyway. Does it really require more knowledge and skill to operate on 14.167 vs 14.344? More spectrum is simply the reward system in use. It was chosen in large part because it's easy to enforce. 73 de Jim, N2EY Not only was it easy to enforce but it was selected because it was a desireable enough reward that people would put in the training to get it. Most rewards in the real world have little relationship to the work requested. You see it in the home too. Kid asks, "Dad can I borrow the car?" Parent replies, "After you mow the front & back lawn and run the edger." There is absolutely no relationship between the two activities. The kid gets a highly desired reward for work that he/she probably doesn't care to do but does it anyway to get the reward. Actually Dee, with some redneck families, mowing the lawn is how they *find* the car! Duckin' and a runnin' now! ;^) - Mike KB3EIA - |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) | Policy | |||
My response to Jim Wiley, KL7CC | Policy | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1366  October 17 2003 | Dx | |||
Low reenlistment rate | Policy | |||
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. | Policy |