Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bill Sohl wrote:
"Mike Coslo" wrote in message ... N2EY wrote: It's not just time in grade but actual supervised work experience. Back in the old days of a 2 year wait for Extra, a ham could just toss the General license in a drawer and do nothing for 2 years, yet the "experience" would still count. We aren't likely to see such experience requirements reinstated either, IMHO. Too bad, that! My personal view is that I would have no problem with a "time-in-grade" requirement to go from General to Extra. Odds are that if someone gets a General and stays then two years later goes for Extra, they were probably at least active as a ham and getting real experience based on their interests in operating at whatever mode/band they like. Correct! I know I made Extra a little sooner than I think I should have. And I know some that made Extra waaay sooner than they should have. I think that Amateur Extra should mean a little something, and experience would help a lot in that respect. that hypothetical General class that just puts the license in a drawer and does nothing for two years, isn't likely to upgrade anyway. - Mike KB3EIA - |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) | Policy | |||
My response to Jim Wiley, KL7CC | Policy | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1366  October 17 2003 | Dx | |||
Low reenlistment rate | Policy | |||
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. | Policy |