| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Mike Coslo" wrote in message ... Bill Sohl wrote: "Mike Coslo" wrote in message ... N2EY wrote: It's not just time in grade but actual supervised work experience. Back in the old days of a 2 year wait for Extra, a ham could just toss the General license in a drawer and do nothing for 2 years, yet the "experience" would still count. We aren't likely to see such experience requirements reinstated either, IMHO. Too bad, that! My personal view is that I would have no problem with a "time-in-grade" requirement to go from General to Extra. Odds are that if someone gets a General and stays then two years later goes for Extra, they were probably at least active as a ham and getting real experience based on their interests in operating at whatever mode/band they like. Correct! I know I made Extra a little sooner than I think I should have. And I know some that made Extra waaay sooner than they should have. I think that Amateur Extra should mean a little something, and experience would help a lot in that respect. that hypothetical General class that just puts the license in a drawer and does nothing for two years, isn't likely to upgrade anyway. - Mike KB3EIA - I've also believed that time in grade at the General level should be required (it would have helped me) but that didn't stop me from personally moving to Extra as fast as I was capable of doing so! Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) | Policy | |||
| My response to Jim Wiley, KL7CC | Policy | |||
| Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1366  October 17 2003 | Dx | |||
| Low reenlistment rate | Policy | |||
| NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. | Policy | |||