LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #14   Report Post  
Old August 15th 04, 08:34 PM
Robert Casey
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Imagine...a whole new "crop" of licensees TRAINED as they learned....No
more nets interrupted...No more autopatches initiated in the middle of a
QSO...No more 10-4 good buddy language.


Some of these mistakes would be "newbie" errors and the new ham will
likely spot the error and not do it again. And how many people
do autopatch anymore, now that cell phones are very common? I don't
have a cell phone, but I think in my 27 years of being a ham I
autopatched once or maybe twice. And
saying "10-4 good buddy" I don't see as a serious mistake.



If the new license requires manufactured rigs and low power,
it doesn't sound much different to a newcomer than getting a
CB setup. And CB doesn't require a license or supervision.
You want kids to choose that route? Actually I started in
CB back in 1976 and then decided to get the ham license as
I liked 2 way radio.

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1412 ­ September 3, 2004 Radionews General 0 September 4th 04 08:35 PM
Why the caste system? was: NCVEC files license restructuringdepends N2EY Policy 25 April 3rd 04 08:28 PM
NCVEC files license resstructuring proposal Bill Sohl Policy 47 March 23rd 04 10:59 PM
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. Keith Policy 1 July 31st 03 03:46 AM
NCVEC Position on Code Jim Hampton Policy 0 July 31st 03 12:50 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:20 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017