| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
August 12th 04, 05:25 PM
|
|||
|
|||
ARRL to propose subband-by-bandwidth regulation
|
|
#2
August 13th 04, 03:18 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"KØHB" wrote in message link.net...
http://www.arrl.org/announce/bandwidth.html So regulate R.R.A.P. by bandwidth. Yelling is 10db wider than everything else. Outlaw yelling. "Sorry Hans, Steve IS Yelling!" Hi, hi! |
|
#3
August 14th 04, 03:26 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"KØHB" wrote in message link.net...
http://www.arrl.org/announce/bandwidth.html Smacks of overegulation. Bloody white of 'em to "let us see it" before they take it to the FCC this time. w3rv |
|
#4
August 14th 04, 05:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Brian Kelly" wrote in message om... "KØHB" wrote in message link.net... http://www.arrl.org/announce/bandwidth.html Smacks of overegulation. Bloody white of 'em to "let us see it" before they take it to the FCC this time. w3rv Remember the letting Novice, non cw, ops on HF Phone??????? There was such a loud cry they at least payed attention this time. Dan/W4NTI |
|
#5
August 15th 04, 09:34 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote in message thlink.net...
"Brian Kelly" wrote in message om... "KØHB" wrote in message link.net... http://www.arrl.org/announce/bandwidth.html Smacks of overegulation. Bloody white of 'em to "let us see it" before they take it to the FCC this time. w3rv Remember the letting Novice, non cw, ops on HF Phone??????? There was such a loud cry they at least payed attention this time. Maybe more like they just tossed us a bone Dan. I keeps compulsively shipping my dues to Newington and I keeps wanting to WRING THEIR SCRAWNY POLITICALLY-CORRECT NECKS! Dan/W4NTI w3rv |
|
#6
August 15th 04, 04:33 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Brian Kelly" wrote in message om... "Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote in message thlink.net... "Brian Kelly" wrote in message om... "KØHB" wrote in message link.net... http://www.arrl.org/announce/bandwidth.html Smacks of overegulation. Bloody white of 'em to "let us see it" before they take it to the FCC this time. w3rv Remember the letting Novice, non cw, ops on HF Phone??????? There was such a loud cry they at least payed attention this time. Maybe more like they just tossed us a bone Dan. I keeps compulsively shipping my dues to Newington and I keeps wanting to WRING THEIR SCRAWNY POLITICALLY-CORRECT NECKS! Dan/W4NTI w3rv It's election time for the Board of Directors. I have brought this up for the last month at club meetings, on the air, announced it on VHF and HF nets. Any interest? Nope. I give up. Dan/W4NTI |
|
#7
August 16th 04, 04:35 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote in message hlink.net...
"Brian Kelly" wrote in message om... "Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote in message thlink.net... "Brian Kelly" wrote in message om... "KØHB" wrote in message link.net... http://www.arrl.org/announce/bandwidth.html Smacks of overegulation. Bloody white of 'em to "let us see it" before they take it to the FCC this time. w3rv Remember the letting Novice, non cw, ops on HF Phone??????? There was such a loud cry they at least payed attention this time. Maybe more like they just tossed us a bone Dan. I keeps compulsively shipping my dues to Newington and I keeps wanting to WRING THEIR SCRAWNY POLITICALLY-CORRECT NECKS! Dan/W4NTI w3rv It's election time for the Board of Directors. I have brought this up for the last month at club meetings, on the air, announced it on VHF and HF nets. Any interest? Nope. I give up. Being a Director is one more hobby within the hobby. It's all politics and hams who are big into being politicians get into it and the rest of us ignore it. Dan/W4NTI w3rv |
|
#8
August 14th 04, 06:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article . net, "KØHB"
writes: http://www.arrl.org/announce/bandwidth.html Some good ideas, some not-so-good ideas. Good ideas: - It's about bandwidth, not content. Right now, if you can fit a digital voice signal into a 200 Hz bandwidth, you can only use it on the 'phone-image subbands. But you can use a much wider PACTOR signal on the CW/data subbands - as long as the PACTOR signal isn't carrying digital voice. - Is Hellschreiber data or image? - Faster data modes have a place to play Bad ideas: - Robot pactors and such can go way down in the band - No CW-only subbands Just IMHO. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
|
#9
August 14th 04, 06:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"N2EY" wrote - No CW-only subbands There never have been any "CW-only" subbands on HF. Personally, I'd propose a regulation similar to what currently exists on 160M --- "Here are your bands. Stay inside of the edges. Have a nice day." 73, de Hans, K0HB |
|
#10
August 14th 04, 11:28 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"KØHB" wrote in message hlink.net...
"N2EY" wrote - No CW-only subbands There never have been any "CW-only" subbands on HF. Personally, I'd propose a regulation similar to what currently exists on 160M --- "Here are your bands. Stay inside of the edges. Have a nice day." The result would be chaos. All you have to do is tune around 160 a bit to come to the conclusion that the ops who get on 160 are with very rare exceptions a whole different breed of cat from the hordes of HF-only spectrum dwellers from a number of perspectives. The "misbehavior ratios" being one of those. If there was a simplistic "unisolution" like you're proposing it would have been implemented decades ago. 73, de Hans, K0HB w3rv |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access | Antenna | |||
| ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | Dx | |||
| ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | General | |||
| ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | Dx | |||
Hybrid Mode
