Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"KØHB" wrote in message hlink.net...
"N2EY" wrote - No CW-only subbands There never have been any "CW-only" subbands on HF. Personally, I'd propose a regulation similar to what currently exists on 160M --- "Here are your bands. Stay inside of the edges. Have a nice day." The result would be chaos. All you have to do is tune around 160 a bit to come to the conclusion that the ops who get on 160 are with very rare exceptions a whole different breed of cat from the hordes of HF-only spectrum dwellers from a number of perspectives. The "misbehavior ratios" being one of those. If there was a simplistic "unisolution" like you're proposing it would have been implemented decades ago. 73, de Hans, K0HB w3rv |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access | Antenna | |||
ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | Dx | |||
ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | General | |||
ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | Dx |