Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "William" wrote in message om... (Jim Hampton) wrote in message . com... (William) wrote in message . com... "Dee D. Flint" wrote in message ... "William" wrote in message om... PAMNO (N2EY) wrote in message ... In article , (Brian Kelly) writes: "KØHB" wrote in message thlink.net... "N2EY" wrote - No CW-only subbands There never have been any "CW-only" subbands on HF. That's true - but there should be! Odd, when I was first licensed I could only use CW on 80, 40, 15, and 10M. Wonder what kind of subbands those were? General class and higher licensees can also use the FSK data modes here. Thus they are not "CW only." Dee D. Flint, N8UZE Now tell me about the Novices. I don't believe the question was about license class; it was about the HF amateur spectrum. In that case, there is no exclusive CW anywhere on HF. On VHF, of course, there is. 73 from Rochester, NY Jim - AA2QA Jim, for a whole class of licensees, there absolutely were CW Only subbands. And if my memory serves, higher class licensees had to abide by the mode and power restrictions. Where's Miccolis with his ham history cliff notes? Look at your FCC rule book. They had to abide by the power restrictions on 15m, 40m, and 80m in the novice subbands but not in the 10m novice subband. In the 10m novice subband, Generals and higher could use full legal limit. In all of those novice subbands, they were NOT restricted to the mode requirements of the novices. READ YOUR RULEBOOK!!! These rules have been in effect for longer than I have been licensed (1992) and I have copies of the rule books for this time period. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access | Antenna | |||
ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | Dx | |||
ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | General | |||
ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | Dx |