| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#24
August 30th 04, 03:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Subject: ARRL to propose subband-by-bandwidth regulation
From: PAMNO (N2EY) Date: 8/30/2004 6:55 AM Central Standard Time Message-id: In article , Dave Heil writes: Oh, I won't. I don't expect Leonard (despite often writing of "getting into" amateur radio) to actually obtain a license during his present incarnation. The license is the least of it. Setting up a station and actually operating it, without government or corporate backing is the bigger challenge these days. His "big time" operations always had government or corporate backing. Except they weren't "his" operations. Len did not design, build, or pay for ADA, for example. Nor did he "operate" the transmitters there, in the sense that hams "operate" their stations. If you read his exploits carefully, you begin to realize that in most situations he was one of a large group, not an independent operator. Not that there's anything wrong with either. Nope. IF he had done them. His MOS was as a radio tech...Not an "operator". I doubt he ever got any closer to radiating RF than loading up the rig into a dummy load. I wonder at Steve/K4YZ's repeated challenges for Len to get a ham license. Would Steve rather have Len on the ham bands or here? What's to worry? Lennie can't pass the test anyway, so none's-to-worry. I remember that one and Cutey Boy's memorable statement. They are, you'll have to admit, quite similar in outcome. You mean neither has yet made good on what they said they'd do. Precisely. So why get all upset? I sure don't. Len's not going to show up on the ham bands. He's not going to write any new technical articles of any consequence for amateur radio publications. He's not going to show up on 7037 kHz CW, nor best any of us in a contest or DXCC. Lennie's last foray into Amateur Radio publishing wound up contributing to the demise of that same journal. Who would WANT to "publish" him...?!?! Some changes must come very slowly. Fun facts: - Despite his claims of being online since dirt was new, Len could not get ECFS to work for him back in early 1999. Couldn't keep up with the times, I suspect. Most of us poor old backward hams got ECFS to work for us, though. He wound up submitting his 98-143 comments by US mail, on disk and paper. He's been a busy wordsmith since then, though, deluging the FCC with commentary. Most of it is obvious cut-and-paste. Poor Bill Cross. It'd be interesting to see if our resident r.r.a.p. g.o.m. (grumpy old man) is the most prolific of commenters. In sheer volume, he's probably pretty close to the top for an induhvidual commenter. Poor Bill Cross. I don't think Bill suffers from Len's copious output. He likely glosses over when his eyes glaze over. *Somebody* at FCC has to read all of it. - FCC got about 2500 comments on 98-143, the last big restructuring. Back in the mid-1960s, FCC got over 6000 comments on "incentive licensing", most of them from individuals, even though there was no ECFS back then and all commentary was plain old words-on-paper. Did Leonard comment on incentive licensing? I don't know. His recall of that regulatory proceeding is quite inaccurate. What's interesting, too, is that back in those pre-ECFS times, FCC got more than twice as many comments, even though there were far fewer hams and far fewer Americans than today. And I dare say far more well prepared and thoughtful pieces too. His declared interest in amateur radio would have taken him back to that era. I "have an interest" in learning Japanese. I know about a half-dozen words in that language. I'm "interested" in learning to weld. I know three people with welders. Domo arigato. - ARRL lobbied to increase the code test speed from 10 to 12.5 wpm in 1936. That was the last time ARRL lobbied for an increase in code test speeds. Indeed, the 1963 ARRL incentive licensing proposal called for no increase in code test speeds (full privileges would have been allowed to Advanceds under that plan) and ARRL *opposed* the FCC idea of a new 16 wpm test for "Amateur First Class" which FCC wanted in 1965. So the mythical "Church of St. Hiram" isn't at all as Len has attempted to portray it? If you mean the ARRL, its policy and operations are quite different than what Len portrays. I do mean the ARRL. I share your view. So Len does, indeed, promulgate myths. Indeed. 73 Steve, K4YZ |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access | Antenna | |||
| ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | Dx | |||
| ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | General | |||
| ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | Dx | |||
Threaded Mode
