About Us

August 24th 04, 06:16 PM

"William" wrote in message
m...
(Len Over 21) wrote in message
...
In article ,
(Steve
Robeson K4CAP) writes:

And this was not about you. It was about Brian P Burke
misrepresenting
his identity and not being man enough or having the conviction to stand
behind his opinions.

More transference. NURSIE doesn't pay much attention to his
emotional outbursts in here...says he "never said such a thing"
after he said it. Strange.

Of course; he lies. But since he's nuts he's not responsible for his
actions.

Because I do have convictions I receive a lot of flack from Yell DMC.

For instance, when Part 97 says you cannot take compensation for
amateur radio, then a repeater owner charges dues....

Dues can hardly be considered compensation. It is perfectly legitimate to
cover the costs of repeater setup, maintenance and operations by charging
such dues. That does not violate the no compensation rule.

For instance, when Part 97 specifies only a Morse Code exam can
satisfy element 1, and the VEC's administer Farnsworth exams....

Part 97 does not define how the exam is to be administered. It simply
requires a candidate to demonstrate a minimum level of proficiency but does
not define the testing method. By the way Farnsworth is Morse code.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE

August 24th 04, 09:59 PM

Subject: Back at Ya, NURSIE
From: "Dee D. Flint"
Date: 8/24/2004 12:16 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

"William" wrote in message
om...
(Len Over 21) wrote in message
...
In article ,
(Steve
Robeson K4CAP) writes:

And this was not about you. It was about Brian P Burke
misrepresenting
his identity and not being man enough or having the conviction to stand
behind his opinions.

More transference. NURSIE doesn't pay much attention to his
emotional outbursts in here...says he "never said such a thing"
after he said it. Strange.

Of course; he lies. But since he's nuts he's not responsible for his
actions.

Because I do have convictions I receive a lot of flack from Yell DMC.

For instance, when Part 97 says you cannot take compensation for
amateur radio, then a repeater owner charges dues....

Dues can hardly be considered compensation. It is perfectly legitimate to
cover the costs of repeater setup, maintenance and operations by charging
such dues. That does not violate the no compensation rule.

Dee, it's just more evidence that Brain (a) doesn't understand that the
"dues" collected for the use of a repeater are for the use of the
machine....NOT for operating a radio.

The FCC has repeatedly stated that accepting funds to defray the cost of
the upkeep of a resource such as a repeater is absolutely legitimate.

Brain, like his mentor before him, convientiently dismiss or ignore FCC
rulings or regulations when it suits them.

For instance, when Part 97 specifies only a Morse Code exam can
satisfy element 1, and the VEC's administer Farnsworth exams....

Part 97 does not define how the exam is to be administered. It simply
requires a candidate to demonstrate a minimum level of proficiency but does
not define the testing method. By the way Farnsworth is Morse code.

There is no such thing as a "Farnsworth" exam.

73

Steve, K4YZ

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
trying to get back on packet using my old equipment	larry	Digital	1	January 15th 05 07:47 AM
BPL - UPLC ->Repeat the lie three times and claim it for truth	King Zulu	Policy	213	July 16th 04 11:31 PM
The Game's Afoot!	Len Over 21	Policy	165	July 3rd 04 01:51 PM
Do Hams get 11 Meters Back	No Code, No Ham	General	74	December 11th 03 09:25 PM

Menu

About Us